I think it is exciting that they broke their mold with this Ved and Physiology technique. There is not a lot of shakti juice in the course necessarily. It is kind of technical between the physiology and the vedic movement-ese in orientation. It is a lot cerebral using a weighty physiology vedic script, sight and sound. But it is a nice introduction to using lite intention and attention for TM virgins. In lingo they leave the TM-transcendent out of it so as to not cross over to the overt territory of TM and TM-siddhis. I don't know what it would do so much for someone just in off the street that is not a transcending meditator already. The very Britisher-like announcer in the audio is somewhat drone and the script material weighty or thick in its way. There is not a lot of silence per se in the whole thing and it does not start with a TM meditation.
The people who lead the course here are bright smart scientist very deep movement types with PhD's, but it would be really interesting if some accomplished spiritual healers like John Douglas or Janet Sussman who are really adept and understood in the implications on the subtle systems could use the Ved and Physiology model gizmo in a similarly led meditation and see what they do with people in turning on subtle energetic chakra systems. -Buck --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@...> wrote: > > I see they're at it again! How many have actually achieved even CC? One? or > none!? TM works but please don't embellish it with hyperbole, enlightenment > isn't something gained in a few years of regular meditation...and don't count > on it to solve all of your problems! > > The devil is in the details and the details are it takes many, many years of > meditation to achieve these purported benefits (more likely lifetimes). > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > Waht does the new course cost? > > > > > > AS an aside, this is rather amzing that a new course is being offered. > > > they are expanidn gon the MMY's TM and siddhis -a new step. It could > > > also be that they need the income from this course. > > > > > > I would love to see an official description of it and how it all works. > > > Your info is always welcome, but I can't really figure out what this is > > > all about from your description and the way you write. > > > > > > > > > $85. Here is an intro: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSMrAB4vV_c > > > > The Individual is Cosmic: Experience the Beautiful Electronic Model of > > Vedic Physiology > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Turq, Yep, the thing that I heard that was interesting was the > > > > positioning of the 'Ved and Physiology' course, which is taught as a > > > > continuing education course, as a technique. > > > > > > > > It is a technique that is practiced like a guided meditation, a > > > > mindfulness meditative process that effectively clears and turns on the > > > > subtle energetic system. In presentation it blends sci-ency and vedic > > > > terminology. They don't use the term, 'chakra' but that is what they > > > > are working on. They are catching up to where so much of the > > > > meditating community has gone on to otherwise. > > > > > > > > To me this was interesting in the 'post-founder era' in that they can > > > > now proceed in a progressive way towards offering a teaching as > > > > developed spiritual technique. It is a blending of sciency and vedic > > > > TM nomenclature. As a course it has been piloted on campus here, at > > > > Vlodrop and movement facilities. Bevan at the lecture mentioned that > > > > over 200 have taken the course here. > > > > > > > > Taking the course features an electronic audio-visual gizmo which > > > > Nadaraam and Maharishi devised that leads the meditation through the > > > > physiology. It is good, it will ground a lot of people in their subtle > > > > system bodies and probably improve a lot of health in people who can be > > > > bright on their top registers but dull and not hardly embodied > > > > otherwise. It provides something spiritually that was missing for TM > > > > virgins that will be good. > > > > > > > > It is highly amusing that it is a mindfulness kind of process. It is > > > > the thing to take on campus right now. People are repeating it, taking > > > > it two and three times & more, for the experiential component of > > > > meditating with the audio-visual guidance. > > > > > > > > FFL, > > > > -Buck in FF > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds really good - glad you were able to go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, I have to thank Raja John Hagelin for granting me an > > > > > > exemption to attend the meeting. It was very nice . > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for providing this information, Buck. > > > > > I was going to ask how someone who was recently > > > > > turned down for a dome pass got to attend. And > > > > > I'm happy that you *got* to attend, if you found > > > > > it valuable or meaningful. Really. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, that said, was there anything *in particular* > > > > > he said that resonated with you? You are often > > > > > WAY too vague on this forum. Just as I'd like to > > > > > see King Tony deal with a real world audience for > > > > > once, I'd like to see you get real with us for > > > > > once and tell us what still gets you off about > > > > > the TM dogma. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
