Barry, are you sure it's the "do not read list?" I think it may be the "do not respond list" - safer that way, isn't it?
________________________________ From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the > > obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the > > pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! > > So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you > predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from > his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding > to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. > My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with > how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) > Anyway you get an "I told you so" on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. > Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some > very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have "rejected" them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or > > > > more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover > > > > that your generous support will help inspire a new generation > > > > to progress, evolve, and grow! > > > > > > Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer > > > service in between programs. And they might be able to sew > > > clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. > > > > > > This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep > > > those pundits away from the white women. > > > > As a further money-saving measure they could just > > stop preparing meals for the students and instead > > throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each > > night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let > > them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also > > be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature > > of a benevolent monarchy. :-) > > >
