Or to be completely precise, it is the "do not respond openly" list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > Barry, are you sure it's the "do not read list?" Â I think it may be the "do > not respond list" - safer that way, isn't it? > > > ________________________________ > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund > > > Â > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the > > > obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the > > > pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! > > > > So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you > > predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from > > his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding > > to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. > > Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. > > > My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with > > how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. > > As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) > > > Anyway you get an "I told you so" on this one.' > > AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt > me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed > it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did > find that amusing. > > > Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some > > very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=-j8ZMMuu7MU > > Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. > > Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, > aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since > this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose > among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little > uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. > > They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who > no longer bother to read their posts have "rejected" them. > It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or > > > > > more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover > > > > > that your generous support will help inspire a new generation > > > > > to progress, evolve, and grow! > > > > > > > > Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer > > > > service in between programs. And they might be able to sew > > > > clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. > > > > > > > > This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep > > > > those pundits away from the white women. > > > > > > As a further money-saving measure they could just > > > stop preparing meals for the students and instead > > > throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each > > > night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let > > > them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also > > > be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature > > > of a benevolent monarchy. :-) > > > > > >
