Heh, I'm reading this post and going, "Hey, this guy's nailing it down." Then I notice it's Curtis the writer.....ahhhhh.
Gotta love that kind of authenticity. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > Doug, > > Hasn't it occurred to you that if this isn't a priority for the movement,and > at many times during its history it has acted in such a way to prove this, > that they really don't believe in this Vedic "non flying" group magic the way > you do? > > They give it lip-service, especially when it is useful to manipulate people > into attending courses, but they have never acted in a way consistent with a > firm conviction that this principle is true. They don't put their money > where their mouth is to make it happen. > > Is there a higher reason than world peace to put the Purusha elsewhere? If > all the catastrophic phobia inducing beliefs were close to true, wouldn't > that be the highest priority? And wouldn't the Rajas, hand picked by > Maharishi for being in tune with his own priorities, be the guys upholding > this key principle? They spent more time around the guy than any of us, they > probably know his mind at least as well as anyone. > > The biggest problem I have with your analysis of Fairfield is the same one I > saw again and again in the movement, not believing that the people charged > with doing what Maharishi wants are actually doing that. Maharishi would > make a money-centric decision that screwed people, it would come right from > him, then people in charge would implement it and the ones affected would > blame it on the messengers. Anything to preserve the illusion of Maharishi's > benevolence. > > The Rajas are all in, they are as believer-er as anyone could be. They > believe as much as you do and are as sincere in trying to do what they > imagine Maharishi wants from them. That is my POV. They are ME back in the > day, with more money so their suits are nicer. > > My take is that Maharishi used the idea of group flying as a convenience to > rally his group. It was either carrot or stick depending on circumstances. > But if he really believed that the world might blow up without some magic > number of people "not flying" together, he would have ponyed up after one of > his real estate windfall sales (College of Natural Law in DC for example) and > made it happen. > > Instead what he did was to spend that money in a manor more consistent with > being a real estate speculator with a team of slave labor renovators (Oh > those special Purushas are so handy!)buying properties all over the place and > then flipping them when the price went up. Having lived in many of them I > can tell you no dime was spent to actually fix them up, we hung sheets > instead of putting up sheetrock walls. > > The movement is moving a bunch of Puruahas because it suits some renovation > need or they just ran out of space and are sick of hearing people bitch, or > too many of them are ending up with girlfriends (bonerific!), or it is time > to shake them all up so they feel like they are on some new special project > instead of pissing their lives away with their eyes closed most of the time > without proper health insurance unless their parents are part of the 1%.(you > know, good karma and all) > > The world peace through flying together idea is one of convenience, pulled > out when the movement wants people to rally in one convenient group to pitch > the new shit to. (the human body in Christmas lights!) > > The dome policy is an exclusionary one and punishes people for even thinking > about spending time with the competition (think about that concept in a > "spiritual" context) because Maharishi himself was the king of the > exclusionary bastards. It was always his way or the highway. > > The Rajas are sincere in doing whatever it is they think Maharishi wanted and > that includes not really acting as if the Maharishi effect is real outside > its usefulness to motivate the group and punishing people who don't tow a > very narrow mental focus on Maharishi alone. They act like self serving > buttholes because that is not only what Maharishi would have wanted, it was > who Maharishi was. > > Sorry to break all this so close to the season when you figured out there is > no Santa Claus, but it will save you a lot of frustration in the long run > believe me. > > The movement is acting exactly as Maharishi would have wanted, as it always > has. Love it or leave it, but you are not going to change it. > > So there you are the last guy to get the memo. dutifully loading animals onto > the ark while inside the carnivores are all sitting around picking their > teeth waiting for the next exotic animal Dominoes' deliver, "Zebra! Yum, so > nice of you to bring us a pair of them!" You are the last Japanese soldier > holding vigil on the Pacific island of Leyte raising and saluting the red > circle flag each morning, while all his battalion are either dead or sitting > with their great-grandchildren on their knees. Not knowing that the war has > been over longer than you and I have been alive. > > World peace is a platitude like live forever. It is a feel good mantra that > distracts from the specific issues that keep the world from getting more > peaceful in specific areas. Problems that don't have simple panacea > solutions like sitting down and closing your eyes with a bunch of other > people. Problems that make us confront how inept we are to deal with even > our own divisive natures. > > I'm struggling to find a landing here...let alone stick one... > > It was a great party but now the guys with the brooms are out sweeping up the > confetti. It is time to go back to work, the sheep are bleating about > whatever it is sheep have on their minds (?). It is the New Year. Don't > spend it fighting your own master's intentions. He isn't worth it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > FWIW, I'm afraid the 13th baktun, or stuff, of Maya-indians, is > > > approaching its end... :0 > > > > > > > Maya- or Mayan-Indians, it don't matter which. > > This is really bad for the Dome numbers, Fairfield, and the World. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > The immediate urgent priority for national invincibility and world > > > > peace is to join the Invincible America Course at MUM. Only 2000 > > > > Flyers, rising to 2500, in Fairfield/Maharishi Vedic City will bring > > > > security to America and defuse the precarious escalation of conflict in > > > > the world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall <thomas.pall@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is from a faculty member at MUM. 100 Purusha are leaving VC > > > > > > next > > > > > > month to go to North Carolina. Is there a new place for Purusha > > > > > > in NC? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There go the Dome Numbers, again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
