--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > LOL.. > > Krishna's darling Gopi, Obba to the rescue. >
Had to bring pani, quench the wounds of the western ambush http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQMyGKj0Z4Y > Everyone here supposedly uses false handles except perhaps for a few folks > such as Rick, Bob and I. > Usernames are a good thing, and I really am Obbajeeba. > Yet these people go on and on with their inane discussions. OK yes I admit to > having insulted the handles - curtisfeltablues and turquoiseb, shukra69..LOL.. > The best of entertainment! > Oh no curtisfeltablues wants to enter the high tech industry since the spare > change he makes from his trailer trash, hillbilly music is not enough and > Ravi Chivukula spread malicious lies on the handle curtisfeltablues..LOL.. > If one has a slave job that the employers seek the wild west internet forums, then one should not use the Internet forums. This is the wild west and some people want to tame it to their slave conditionings? > They are so attached to even the fake id's they create but it's all opinion, > POV's as they say, no truth as curtisfeltablues and turquoiseb constantly > remind us. Aah but why does it hurt so much. I think I really hit at > curtisfeltablues's weaknesses, there's gotta be something more to this that > he doesn't want to admit. Clearly there's more and he wants this discussion > to end..:-) > The mud slingin ain't comin from one direction, Paw. What I mean is ain't no truth comin from one side neither, right Paw? Yep, its in the brain, what ticks one off. > What pathetic, false lives they live, false beliefs they insulate themselves. > Well, ya know what? I think they be a lil rough around the edges from life taken a beaten on them, or bein conditioned to blame. > Hypocrisy and ridiculousness rules supreme here. > > Yep, uh huh. Sure is thick around here and easy to spot. No wonder thems, theys thinks we are on teams. Them being the adversary to truth. Theys not wrong, jus don't see without the fog lifting once in while. You have cut the fog and it was clear before theys figur'd out what they woas lookin at. Kind of shockin to youngin souls, Ravi. The funniest thang would be all of us of FFL sittin at a round table, staring at each other face to face and I know you would lovingly embrace each and everyone of em, right Paw? You have heart. (;;;\/;;;) \;;;;;;/ \;;;;/ \;;/ \/ > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:50 PM, obbajeeba <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > Nice sunset, Ravi. > > But,I think you posted a lie. The lie is the sun has set and it not the > > same view as before since you posted this photo. So that is not telling the > > truth, because now is all that exists and you called that a sunset. No > > lying allowed on FFL. Nope. Everyone needs to just tell the truth. Name, > > birth date, social security numbers (those are supposed to be confidential, > > but credit card companies can use them now.) Driver's license numbers and > > insurance agent. Please give a detailed education background,including > > preschools attended. > > Mobil phone numbers are a must! Please show any and all medical records and > > all court orders on your profile, it is necessary as the wayback machine > > counsels you to do so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F13urnxh3w4. > > The sun has not set, Ravi. Ravi shines from all locations from the center > > of our solar system. The rest of us only get to view his greatness as we > > spin around all crazy and such, thousands of miles per hour, no wonder our > > heads are spinning, thinking Ravi lies. : ) > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sunset, Venice Beach Jan 8, 2011 > > > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/73243621@N07/6663473701 > > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > > > > I even saw a couple of girls in bikinis, hello welcome to Southern > > > > California :-). I can for at least look past Ravi's unhealed personal > > > > wounds and share in the joy of families and couples around. > > > > > > > > I thought I would post out by Monday so I can focus on work. I clearly > > > > have failed :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > > > > >> OK cool. I have moved on, to the beach, to watch the beautiful Sunset. > > > >> Living a block away from a crowded beach is such a pleasure. > > > >> > > > >> Love, > > > >> Ravi > > > >> > > > >> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:36 PM, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > > > >>> <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Susan, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I'm sorry why would Judy need to be accountable for anything. She > > > >>> > knew exactly why I was intentionally lying. I acknowledged I was > > > >>> > lying as well. > > > >>> > > > >>> Ok, but it would be simpler and certainly would be kinder not to lie > > > >>> to start with, even if you are replying to lies of others. As we all > > > >>> know, lying by one person does not justify lying by another. It > > > >>> simply perpetuates the mess. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > It's just hypocritical for you to create categories and grades of > > > >>> > lies. Barry, Vaj and Curtis lie regularly though Curtis much more > > > >>> > subtle, complex. And they don't even admit to their lying and > > > >>> > deception, they have so much emotional investment. > > > >>> > > > >>> I guess we all have emotional investment. I can think of little in my > > > >>> life that is objective. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Just because I stretch the limits and go overboard in my lying that > > > >>> > you are forced to even acknowledge, confront it. > > > >>> > > > >>> You would be acknowledged without lying and also without being so > > > >>> wild. > > > >>> > > > >>> Curtis starts acting like a wimp, a victim. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > This is just ridiculous and hypocritical. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Jan 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" > > > >>> > > <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > My perspective on Judy has certainly changed over time. From > > > >>> > > > one of > > > >>> > > > mostly a critic to someone who often respects and is in > > > >>> > > > agreement with > > > >>> > > > her opinions and observations. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > But here is something I have found instructive. Judy was asked, > > > >>> > > > twice, > > > >>> > > > if she felt Ravi had gone overboard in his slandering of > > > >>> > > > Curtis. (New > > > >>> > > > Years Eve incident) (Please allow me proceed with this term, > > > >>> > > > since > > > >>> > > > there has been no evidence to suggest that Curtis engaged in the > > > >>> > > > behavior for which he accused) > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > She was asked this question by someone who I consider an honest > > > >>> > > > broker > > > >>> > > > -wayback71. Judy evidently objected to the way the question was > > > >>> > > > phrased > > > >>> > > > and would not answer it. Later on she finally provided some > > > >>> > > > answer. > > > >>> > > > By that time I did not pay much attention to it, but one thing > > > >>> > > > she said > > > >>> > > > was, and I believe I have the quote correct, or correct enough, > > > >>> > > > "Susan > > > >>> > > > knows I don't endorse lying..." > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Well, if a person doesn't endorse lying, then at one point do > > > >>> > > > you stand > > > >>> > > > up and oppose it? > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Exactly. We all know Judy would normally stand up right away - > > > >>> > > within seconds - if someone, anyone, even a friend, was lying. > > > >>> > > She missed this one. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Then today, in an exchange with Curtis, we find that this > > > >>> > > > oppostion to > > > >>> > > > "lying" is conditional as to whether a person "deserves" to be > > > >>> > > > defended > > > >>> > > > from lying. Evidently she feels, or felt that Curtis was not > > > >>> > > > entitled > > > >>> > > > to this defending. Or that the slander was not sufficient > > > >>> > > > enough to > > > >>> > > > warrant addressing it. Well if that is the case, then don't > > > >>> > > > make a > > > >>> > > > blanket statment that "so and so knows I oppose lying" > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > What do you think? > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Of course I agree with you! As you said, I did ask her twice, > > > >>> > > humbling myself the second time so as give her an chance to > > > >>> > > answer. Judy could have used that question to begin to distance > > > >>> > > herself from Ravi's lie, from anyone's lying in a hurtful and > > > >>> > > malicious way here. But she dug in. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > I too find many of Judy's posts interesting and filled with > > > >>> > > intelligence and honesty. That is why I was so surprised that she > > > >>> > > would not call Ravi on intentionally lying about Curtis. Judy was > > > >>> > > right - I do know that she opposes lying, but IMO she went astray > > > >>> > > on this one and should have piped up. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > I suspect that at this point, regardless of all the other complex > > > >>> > > discussion, Judy made a few bad choices on this one. She can be > > > >>> > > Ravi's friend, ignore or call him on lies, and move on. Basically > > > >>> > > I think we all share the same feeling that gross and malicious > > > >>> > > lying about significant issues - the kind of stuff that can hurt > > > >>> > > your reputation out in real life - is not welcome here, not about > > > >>> > > anyone. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
