--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> The other day, as a bullet point under a list of things 
> I found Interesting (as opposed to Not Interesting) on 
> the Internet, I came up with the following cafe blurb, 
> written quickly and probably under the influence of a 
> second mocha cappuchino: 
> 
> > * Those who listen to other posters enough to get 
> > a feeling for the things they find interesting, and 
> > then write to discuss those things. But discuss, not 
> > argue. For example, I may be interested in movies, 
> > but I am completely uninterested in arguing about 
> > them. Taste is subjective; you either like a movie 
> > or you don't. Being "right" doesn't enter into the 
> > picture.
> 
> In retrospect, I think I was Onto Something with this 
> particular mini-rant, so I will expand upon it. 
> 
> My subjective opinion -- which is officially worth
> Jack Shit -- is that there are often more interesting
> spiritual discussions to be found on forums discussing
> movies and TV than there are on forums discussing
> spirituality. 
> 
> I think this is because people on movie forums *cut
> each other more slack*. They are less liable to become
> didactic and authoritarian about their views of a movie,
> because most of them realize that "It's only a movie."
> It's a piece of art, and by definition the appreciation
> of art is subjective. You and I may argue for days about
> whether "Desperado" is a better movie than "Citizen Kane"
> ( and it may well be :-), but at the end of the argument
> nothing would have been proved or decided. The argument
> started with two people holding opinions, and it ended
> with two people holding opinions. As a result, folks on
> movie forums don't tend to develop into agressive 
> cliques who battle each other for some kind of imaginary 
> supremacy. Roger Ebert may have loathed poor Gene Siskel
> *at the moment* when he gave away the ending to "The
> Crying Game," but next week they were back to (fairly)
> cordially trading opinions about other movies, agreeing
> on some, disagreeing on others.
> 
> On the spiritual forums...er...not so much. 
> 
> There it is more likely to find people who are convinced
> that their opinions are *more* than opinion, some kind
> of Truth. Discussions of whether God exists or not or
> whether Krishna was really blue are NEVER "only a movie."
> "They're discussions of Truth, goddammit, and only we/I/
> my group *know* the Truth." 
> 
> Therefore arguments that can be classed AS arguments 
> (as opposed to mere energetic swapping of differing
> opinions) tend to spring up on the spiritual forums.
> People try really hard to "win" them. Even though as
> far as I can see, the things being argued about can
> no more be "proved" to be Truth than one movie can be
> "proved" to be better than another. BORING.
> 
> In my experience, movie and TV freaks tend to be nicer
> people than spiritual seekers. They're more likely to
> treat each other as equals, and with compassion. If I 
> had to recommend to a young person what might be better
> for their evolution -- hanging out on an Internet movie
> forum or hanging out on a spiritual forum -- I'd have
> to go with movies. You meet a nicer class of people.
>

La ta da ta da ta da.. 
http://www.online-literature.com/wilde/1307/ Life imitates art?
Let us pretend that Barry the Turq treats people nice anywhere.

 He lives in the motion of what is stilled by his comments, that cannot be held 
to subjection, because he rules, he is in charge and he decides what is.

Barry, this is my last post till later this evening for this is number  50.  I 
felt it most appropriate to wait until you place your footsies in your mouth as 
with this post.  
 The man of movie vs. a spirituality forum, and what you appear to be lacking 
is cooth. An organic being who finds fake movie forums more enlightening than 
fake spiritual posts and calls it, "a nice class of people." 
Mr. Movie  l'urine au jus, they are all made for you.
This is for you my sweet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvUgSXwRg0A 

Barry, why were you so mean to me?
Why? Why?  Why?

I thank Judy and the MaskedZebra for keeping me during my most vulnerable time 
when post limits were to be abided.  
I was down as a winged creature with a broken wing and I believe Barry took 
that shot at me, knowing this. What kind of a man does that make he?


Reply via email to