--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: <snip> > Second, there was a series of posts here by a person who > is now longer allowed to post. This person threatened > Curtis multiple times, and still Curtis asked that others > not intervene or defend him. Partly I think this was to > protect others from possibly getting themselves on the > bad side of this poster. Partly he knew could handle it > himself.
I'm calling you on this, Susan. You were here when it unfolded. You know many people *did* defend Curtis and criticize Ravi, and that Curtis said he was grateful for it. You also know not only that Curtis went after me in a big way for not having defended him, but that *you* went after me as well, demanding to know why I hadn't spoken up about Ravi's lie concerning Curtis. Why you're now maintaining otherwise, I can't imagine, unless it's because Ann doesn't know what happened and you think you can put something over on her. That sure doesn't sound like you, so I'd welcome hearing a better explanation, as well as an acknowledgment of this correction.
