Beware, Ann. The same "Pile on, pile on...gotta support my favorites" mentality that brought down Robin, Ravi, and Jim on this forum might work the same way on Judy. Pander to a personality-disordered person's disorder, and you might just push them over the edge. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@ wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > You got it Barry. That tousle headed rapscallion Nabbie barely > > > made a blip on the outrage meter with his using a burning human > > > being as a putdown of your and a whole religion which, of course, > > > you rightly notice is a bit of a trend. (constantly) > > > > Note that my prediction that Curtis would not correct > > Barry's lie about *Curtis's own post*--which had not > > a thing to do with Buddhism--was 100 percent accurate. > > > > <snip> > > > How many posts were focused on a Yo mamma parody of Oprah? > > > > One from me, until Curtis attempted disingenuously to defend > > it. The rest of my posts were focused on that defense. > > > > > Did it get a "this is offensive, please take it down"? Nope > > > it got the full monte of outrage. > > > > The original got *one single post* from me. And no, I > > didn't ask that it be taken down. It wasn't as offensive > > as Nabby's post; it didn't feature a ghastly photo of > > a human being dying in agony for a cause he believed in > > soley for the purpose of a cheap shot at Barry. > > > > That Curtis attempts to draw some kind of equivalence > > here is just more evidence of his hypocrisy and > > disingenuity. > > > > > Any twist of phrase from you like "a bit off" gets both > > > barrels. > > > > The only reason Barry got more than one post on his > > "a bit off" was his vicious dissing of Ann for daring > > to object to the phrase. > > > > Barry and Curtis are out of control. > > Judy, "out of control" is just scratching the surface of what is going on here. Curtis and Barry are having an orgiastic climax at the moment. I am discovering that there are no limits here for them. They actually feed, thrive and grow more monstrous on other people's, normal human being's, outrage and sense of violation of what they are putting out here. > > I am not sure what the answer is; push against it or ignore it? But whatever posters choose to do, statements made and behavior exhibited by Curtis and Barry are indicative of something seriously wrong with them. It is not about burning men, inappropriate posts or past perceived wrongs. It is more about spewing vitriol because it gives them some sort of perverted rush to watch otherwise reasonable people react.They have an addiction to reaction, but only violent, shocked, negative, outraged ones. I hate to put words out that are remotely aimed in their direction because this kind of malevolent eye starts to slowly turn my way, unblinking and full of hatred - for me and for life. It is about as horrendous as I have ever witnessed. > > > They have convinced > > themselves that as a team, they're invincible. But all > > they're doing is helping each other reveal their own > > weaknesses. > > It is invulnerability which is a result of lack of feeling. > > > > > A fucking burning human being. > > > > > > Oh, that little scamp! > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Seems to me that if Judy Stein were as "fair and balanced" > > > > as she claims to be on this forum, she would be able to > > > > produce at least one post (other than the recent one, which > > > > can arguably be attributed to Curtis shaming her into making > > > > it) in which she criticized either Nabby or Jim for their > > > > religion-bashing. > > > > > > > > Nabby has made over 500 posts bashing either "Buddhists," > > > > "Buddhism," "Tibet," "Tibetans," or the "Dalai Lama" (or, > > > > as he prefers to spell it, the "Dolly Lama") over the > > > > years at FFL. > > > > > > > > Jim Flanegin made over 200 posts bashing the same subjects. > > > > > > > > Surely, given her oh-so-evolved sensibilities about "fairness," > > > > she can come up with a few posts she's made suggesting that > > > > this might be a "little off." > > > > > > > > If she'd commented on even 1% of them, that would be seven > > > > posts that she'd be able to find and repost here, wouldn't > > > > it? IF, that is, any such posts were ever made. > > > > > > > > I think we all know that none ever were. > > > > > > > > Could this be because Nabby's posts are "mostly jocular > > > > Buddhist-bashing aimed at Barry and Vaj?" Or because > > > > Barry and Vaj are "the most vicious, intemperate, and > > > > dishonest bashers of TMers on the forum" and in Judy's > > > > view (as she just stated) Nabby's posts don't really > > > > give them the "bashing they truly deserve?" ( Perhaps > > > > Judy would like to give us that bashing herself. I for > > > > one would like to read it. :-) > > > > > > > > Or could it be that Nabby's "jocular" posts, such as > > > > the recent one, are merely "poking fun" at Vaj, I, and > > > > 350 million Buddhists in the world, whereas our posts > > > > about TM and TMers are "vicious attacks and insults?" > > > > > > > > Does anyone detect a double standard here? > > > > > > > > Perhaps, since she will be unable to find any posts > > > > in which she has criticized Nabby or Jim for any of > > > > their "jocular" posts ragging on Buddhism and Tibet, > > > > she could find a few posts of mine and Vaj's that > > > > she feels are "vicious attacks" and repost them. I > > > > look forward to seeing them, because I suspect they'll > > > > be of the same ilk as the "death threat" she claims > > > > was made against her here on Fairfield Life. That is, > > > > pure vindictive drama queenery. :-) > > > > > > > > > >
