--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: <snip> > It would be easy just to chalk this up to some person going > off on the Internet with a general ad hominem attack that > says more about them than their intended target... > > but, this is a poster who as spent a considerable amount of > time scolding the group about it being full of low life > gratuitous personal attacks and distancing herself from this > behavior.
And even *she* was so fed up she couldn't contain herself. <snip> > It was about hypocrisy and contriving something to attack > Barry on under the virtuous guise of: Oh the inhumanity > of it all,for me. Note that Curtis once again avoids pointing out that Barry lied blatantly as to what it was about. > I guess I am to assume that you Ann are proposing that you > represent the position of the "reasonable" here, which makes > it all the more important to ask what those reasons might be > for the charges. Curtis knows very well what the charges are against himself because his behavior was calculated and deliberate. Ann will speak for herself if she chooses, but I'll reiterate: Curtis condemned Ann and me for hypocrisy for not chastising Nabby when he, Curtis, had no reason to think either Ann or I would have seen Nabby's post yet--only 20 minutes after Nabby made it, at a point in the afternoon when neither Ann nor I had made any recent posts. Curtis did this knowing that nobody would be likely to check the time stamps of the posts and would assume, if they read Curtis's post before they saw mine to Nabby two hours later, that Curtis's accusation of hypocrisy was on target. And if they *had* seen my post, they would assume I had been shamed into it by Curtis, even though I had made mine before I read Curtis's. Curtis knew *exactly what he was doing*. He saw a chance for a setup, and he took it. Just as he tried earlier to set me up with his Big Reveal about Robin's emails to him concerning me. That earlier one was a disaster for Curtis. He took a risk and it bit him badly in the ass because he'd seriously misjudged my relationship with Robin. Barry and Vaj, piling on, were collateral damage. Curtis figured this latest nasty trick was a lot safer, and he's probably right, because understanding what he did and why is more complicated. And of course he'll never admit to it, much less apologize. I'm leaving this follow-up post from Curtis to Barry in as documentation of how certain Curtis was that he had scored: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You got it Barry. That tousle headed rapscallion Nabbie > > > > barely made a blip on the outrage meter with his using a > > > > burning human being as a putdown of your and a whole > > > > religion which, of course, you rightly notice is a bit > > > > of a trend. (constantly) > > > > > > Note that my prediction that Curtis would not correct > > > Barry's lie about *Curtis's own post*--which had not > > > a thing to do with Buddhism--was 100 percent accurate. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > How many posts were focused on a Yo mamma parody of Oprah? > > > > > > One from me, until Curtis attempted disingenuously to defend > > > it. The rest of my posts were focused on that defense. > > > > > > > Did it get a "this is offensive, please take it down"? Nope > > > > it got the full monte of outrage. > > > > > > The original got *one single post* from me. And no, I > > > didn't ask that it be taken down. It wasn't as offensive > > > as Nabby's post; it didn't feature a ghastly photo of > > > a human being dying in agony for a cause he believed in > > > soley for the purpose of a cheap shot at Barry. > > > > > > That Curtis attempts to draw some kind of equivalence > > > here is just more evidence of his hypocrisy and > > > disingenuity. > > > > > > > Any twist of phrase from you like "a bit off" gets both > > > > barrels. > > > > > > The only reason Barry got more than one post on his > > > "a bit off" was his vicious dissing of Ann for daring > > > to object to the phrase. > > > > > > Barry and Curtis are out of control.
