--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > On 05/14/2012 12:23 PM, salyavin808 wrote: > >
> > I wouldn't take Sri Sri Webster's definition of consciousness. After > all was he (or the staff) enlightened? Nah, they're going to take the > "flatlander" version. > > You see I take the totality of existence as consciousness and by that I > don't mean "mine" but the consciousness of the "universe". After all > that is what moksha is about. By now I would expect everyone here to be > experiencing that or demanding a refund. :-D My consciousness is the only one I know about. I assume others do - especially if they think about things like this! But I don't ascribe it to inanimate matter as it doesn't need it, in fact it gets along fine without it so I prefer not to elaborate it's already wondrous immensity. As the late great Douglas Adams put it: It's enough for me to know that a garden is beautiful without thinking there are fairies at the bottom of it as well.
