--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >  If there is no consciousness, how can the concept of space dimensions 
> > > > exist?
> > > > 
> > > > Because it's a reality not a concept? And if it wasn't we
> > > > wouldn't have had anywhere to evolve, unless you think that
> > > > didn't happen.
> > > >
> > > Sal,
> > > 
> > > Here's an explanation by Dr. John Hagelin about consciousness and its 
> > > relationship with the universe.  This should help explain the concepts 
> > > we've been discussing.
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrcWntw9juM&feature=related
> > > 
> > > JR
> > 
> > Thanks, I got nearly 1.35 minutes into it before switching off.
> > Good of him to admit there is no scientific consensus on what
> > he says but he then went on to claim that superstring theory is
> > the unified field etc. There's no consensus on that either. I
> > could guess the rest, there's no consensus on consciousness
> > creating the world - except among gurus with yagyas to sell or
> > movies to promote....
> >
> 
> Sal,
> 
> So, which cosmological model do you think is right in describing how the 
> universe started?

The simplest one.

 
> JR
>


Reply via email to