--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If there is no consciousness, how can the concept of space dimensions > > > > exist? > > > > > > > > Because it's a reality not a concept? And if it wasn't we > > > > wouldn't have had anywhere to evolve, unless you think that > > > > didn't happen. > > > > > > > Sal, > > > > > > Here's an explanation by Dr. John Hagelin about consciousness and its > > > relationship with the universe. This should help explain the concepts > > > we've been discussing. > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrcWntw9juM&feature=related > > > > > > JR > > > > Thanks, I got nearly 1.35 minutes into it before switching off. > > Good of him to admit there is no scientific consensus on what > > he says but he then went on to claim that superstring theory is > > the unified field etc. There's no consensus on that either. I > > could guess the rest, there's no consensus on consciousness > > creating the world - except among gurus with yagyas to sell or > > movies to promote.... > > > > Sal, > > So, which cosmological model do you think is right in describing how the > universe started?
The simplest one. > JR >