--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Video Interview: Maharishi Mahesh Yogi > "Celibate" Guru had a love affair - Judith Bourque > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Rick, > > > > Had it not been for what you said about Maharishi and secrecy, I doubt I > > would have posted anything about this matter. But something alerted in me > > when I read your comment. > > > > I think it was the toothpaste. :-) > > > > You will see that I have added a ninth reflection, for me, the most > > important one of all. > > > > The only way anything can change here is if either Bevan or someone else > can > > communicate to us something about Maharishi which somehow is inclusive of > > his behaviour with women--women, that is, who caused him to feel intense > > physical desire. > > > > Perhaps with Bevan (or this other person) such a portrait of Maharishi can > > emerge. But that would mean writing a book--it is I believe a book that > > Bevan's soul desperately would want him to write, but Bevan, he is likely > to > > deny to his soul this satisfaction. > > > > Robin > > > > Bevan was as guilty of such behavior as MMY was. I doubt any such book > will > > be forthcoming. > > But surely not the oh so spotless Mr. Rick Archer, no Sir ! > > I had a stumble or two. >
But the Great Sage couldn't possibly? One thing I noted after listening to the SCI tapes was that according to MMY's theory, it was *impossible* for someone to be fully enlightened because the consciousness of the world wouldn't support it. When I pointed this out to a TM teacher, he insisted that MMY's theory didn't apply to MMY or Gurudev. L.
