Dumbass or Doc works just fine, though any of 'em fit - y tu, raunchydog?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Name: Doctor Dumbass.
> > Rank: not usually (smells armpits reflexively).
> > Serial #: OK, I'll take 37 through 74.
> >
> > Responz: Judee, Judee, Judee...(though you can't hear the cary grant in it)
> > - you have firmly claimed the stage, and I graciously yield to you...sotto
> > voce (hey, that's enough with the hook, guys...she's got the
> > floor...cheesus...)
> >
>
> Welcome aboard. Do you prefer being called Doc, Doctor or Dumbass? Rank
> armpits...good one. It appeals to my grade school sense of humor.
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > dear authfriend, it is far easier to build a nice new home, than to
> > > > continually attempt to fix another's that is shoddy, and always in need
> > > > of repair - kindly, The Good Doctor. in SBAL it says you can tell by
> > > > the outside of a dwelling, the consciousness of the inhabitants.
> > >
> > > Doc, although I addressed Barry directly, it was not in an
> > > attempt to "fix" him, simply to correct his assertions for
> > > the record.
> > >
> > > And if you'll forgive me, while your observations are
> > > interesting, it's generally not considered good form for a
> > > newbie to a forum to instruct its members in how to conduct
> > > themselves. Stick around, participate in conversations, get
> > > to know the other members, absorb some of the context of
> > > the group and its dynamics. Then you'll be in a better
> > > position to offer advice.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > WHY he "seemed normal" was that he *joined them* in their online
> > > > > > harassment and persecution of the woman in question. It was more
> > > > > > important to them to "get" the woman they collectively disliked
> > > > > > than to notice that he was in a fragile mental state, and in need
> > > > > > of *help* in dealing with his psychological problems, not in
> > > > > > acting them out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does any of this sound *familiar* to Fairfield Life members?
> > > > >
> > > > > Only by way of your posts pretending that it happens here.
> > > > >
> > > > > > This shit is dangerous, people. You're messing with fragile
> > > > > > and unbalanced personalities
> > > > >
> > > > > You mean to say "people who *in my opinion* are fragile
> > > > > and unbalanced personalities."
> > > > >
> > > > > But that's a little problematic because you tend to
> > > > > portray anyone who criticizes or disagrees with you as a
> > > > > "fragile and unbalanced" personality.
> > > > >
> > > > > >, and attempting to *use* them to either exact
> > > > > > "retribution" for grudges you've been carrying for years, or
> > > > > > to support fantasy ideas about enlightenment or the spiritual
> > > > > > process you've been clinging to for years.
> > > > >
> > > > > And this is pure fantasy that even you are aware is not
> > > > > true. That you keep pushing this absurd notion in an
> > > > > attempt to get back at your critics leads some of us to
> > > > > wonder whether the "fragile and unbalanced" personality
> > > > > is you.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
