Sorry, I had to step outside for a smoke after that scene. Susan picked up on my very real appreciation for Curtis. Let me tell you, if Robin pulls a number like this on me, I will post a picture of my incredibly adorable terrier, and metaphorically roll over and ask him to rub my stomach.
________________________________ From: Robin Carlsen <maskedze...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:43 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!" --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :)  It's O.K. Curtis...your > > reputation is safe.  No worries.  > > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother to > spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!), my > guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the > other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the > noise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE ________________________________ > > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; > > it's my turn!" > > > > > >  > > Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful > > to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive, > > threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the tough > > initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your shameless, whiny, > > drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as well. > > > > You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I > > came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist my > > innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a drink > > for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into believing I > > was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online reputation. Your > > cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting stale, barn yard > > stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your online moniker don't > > try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what kind of place FFL is - > > Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare I say Jesus of this list. > > > > You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of > > these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone > > calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby > > to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique. > > > > Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some > > other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't get > > into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool you > > are. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and > > >you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even though > > >I would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to humble you > > >and would never even mean that which is something I know because I am, > > >after all, myself. > > > > > >You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even > > >got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was > > >just perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV. > > > > > >I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as > > >spiteful as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope you > > >are sitting smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me. > > > > > >If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many > > >ways to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling. > > > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the > > >> humble thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a > > >> little there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your > > >> fundamental response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our > > >> relationship, Curtis. Find some other ones. This is getting fun. Because > > >> if you cite examples they must be sufficient in their cumulative effect > > >> to vitiate the essential truth of the two posts. Else MY IRONY HAS > > >> FAILED. > > >> > > >> Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out > > >> from the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But > > >> if you take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not > > >> ENTIRELY be sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. So > > >> the exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU. > > >> > > >> It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same > > >> time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU. > > >> > > >> Let's keep it going, Curtis. > > >> > > >> Robin > > >> > > > > > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > >> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or > > >> > > > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple. > > >> > > > > >> > > No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is > > >> > > within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within > > >> > > his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has > > >> > > misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin. > > >> > > > >> > Really? So I have threatened Robin that his days on FFL are numbered? > > >> > That I will humble him? I have to make a case for how he > > >> > misrepresented me to get him to stop? > > >> > > > >> > You don't get the issue Judy. You are following Robin's lead to coerce > > >> > me into going point by point to refute his made-up bullshit. As if > > >> > that is the main point of why it might not be cool to make up shit and > > >> > sign other people's names. > > >> > > > >> > Judy, your eyes are brown on this one. Guess why. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Dear Curtis, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your > > >> > > > > voice, > > >> > > > and specify which passages in either post you feel are untruthful; > > >> > > > that > > >> > > > is, you would not say what I have you saying. "There were many > > >> > > > statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think > > >> > > > I had > > >> > > > generated". If there are such statements, this tends to defeat my > > >> > > > argument. I would like some examples. Once you provide these, I > > >> > > > will > > >> > > > arrange--I am sure either Rick and Alex can do this--to head each > > >> > > > of > > >> > > > these posts with: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT > > >> > > > > FOLLOWS IS > > >> > > > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH > > >> > > > CURTIS. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I am sure this will clear up the problem, won't it, Curtis? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > You are such a sweet and loveable guy. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Oh, by the way, I do believe I represented your sentiments > > >> > > > > exactly. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I would like to hear you refute what I have said so I can > > >> > > > > imagine how > > >> > > > I could have been wrong here. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > If you would not have said (in principle) what i have you saying > > >> > > > > then > > >> > > > it means the irony did not--to use a Share word--"fly". > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > If you can sincerely show me examples of statements--in either > > >> > > > post--which are false in their attempt to speak in your voice, I > > >> > > > need to > > >> > > > see them. Because, to repeat myself for the third time, it means I > > >> > > > did > > >> > > > not succeed in what I attempted. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Now let us love one another, Curtis. I have followed you very > > >> > > > > closely > > >> > > > for over a year. What i said in both posts for me was Curtis all > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > way. Just not as witty, not as hard-hitting, not as clever, not as > > >> > > > colorful. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > For me, everything is forever. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Robin > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > >> > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing > > >> > > > > > Robin? > > >> > > > really? > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of > > >> > > > > > straw > > >> > > > men versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us > > >> > > > just > > >> > > > skim posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to > > >> > > > keep > > >> > > > track without this in the mix. There were many statements in what > > >> > > > you > > >> > > > wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you > > >> > > > want > > >> > > > to play fast and lose with accuracy and just assume other people > > >> > > > will > > >> > > > keep up, please do it at your expense in the future,not mine. This > > >> > > > shit > > >> > > > we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some > > >> > > > responsibilities. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >