Ravi: The smoking reference was in reference to the video - check the video. Sorry, I'll settle down, promise....as soon as I pour myself a scotch.
________________________________ From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!" LOL.. P.S I didn't know you smoked - imagine this, you, I and Judy (if she consented to smoke one again) smoking..what fun..LOL On Sep 10, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Sorry, I had to step outside for a smoke after that scene. > > >Susan picked up on my very real appreciation for Curtis. Let me tell you, if >Robin pulls a number like this on me, I will post a picture of my incredibly >adorable terrier, and metaphorically roll over and ask him to rub my stomach. > > > > >________________________________ > From: Robin Carlsen <maskedze...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:43 PM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my >turn!" > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: >> > >> > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :)  It's O.K. Curtis...your >> > reputation is safe.  No worries.  >> >> I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother to >> spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!), my >> guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the >> other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the >> noise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE > >________________________________ >> > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> >> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM >> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; >> > it's my turn!" >> > >> > >> >  >> > Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful >> > to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive, >> > threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the >> > tough initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your shameless, >> > whiny, drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as well. >> > >> > You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I >> > came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist my >> > innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a drink >> > for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into believing I >> > was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online reputation. Your >> > cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting stale, barn yard >> > stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your online moniker don't >> > try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what kind of place FFL is - >> > Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare I say Jesus of this >> > list. >> > >> > You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of >> > these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone >> > calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby >> > to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique. >> > >> > Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some >> > other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't get >> > into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool you >> > are. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > > >> > >OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and >> > >you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even >> > >though I would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to >> > >humble you and would never even mean that which is something I know >> > >because I am, after all, myself. >> > > >> > >You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even >> > >got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was >> > >just perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV. >> > > >> > >I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as >> > >spiteful as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope >> > >you are sitting smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me. >> > > >> > >If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many >> > >ways to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling. >> > > >> > > >> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> >> > >wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the >> > >> humble thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a >> > >> little there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your >> > >> fundamental response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our >> > >> relationship, Curtis. Find some other ones. This is getting fun. >> > >> Because if you cite examples they must be sufficient in their >> > >> cumulative effect to vitiate the essential truth of the two posts. Else >> > >> MY IRONY HAS FAILED. >> > >> >> > >> Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out >> > >> from the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But >> > >> if you take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not >> > >> ENTIRELY be sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. >> > >> So the exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU. >> > >> >> > >> It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same >> > >> time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU. >> > >> >> > >> Let's keep it going, Curtis. >> > >> >> > >> Robin >> > >> >> > > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >> > >> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or >> > >> > > > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is >> > >> > > within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within >> > >> > > his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has >> > >> > > misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin. >> > >> > >> > >> > Really? So I have threatened Robin that his days on FFL are numbered? >> > >> > That I will humble him? I have to make a case for how he >> > >> > misrepresented me to get him to stop? >> > >> > >> > >> > You don't get the issue Judy. You are following Robin's lead to >> > >> > coerce me into going point by point to refute his made-up bullshit. >> > >> > As if that is the main point of why it might not be cool to make up >> > >> > shit and sign other people's names. >> > >> > >> > >> > Judy, your eyes are brown on this one. Guess why. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@> >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Dear Curtis, >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your >> > >> > > > > voice, >> > >> > > > and specify which passages in either post you feel are >> > >> > > > untruthful; that >> > >> > > > is, you would not say what I have you saying. "There were many >> > >> > > > statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think >> > >> > > > I had >> > >> > > > generated". If there are such statements, this tends to defeat my >> > >> > > > argument. I would like some examples. Once you provide these, I >> > >> > > > will >> > >> > > > arrange--I am sure either Rick and Alex can do this--to head each >> > >> > > > of >> > >> > > > these posts with: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT >> > >> > > > > FOLLOWS IS >> > >> > > > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH >> > >> > > > CURTIS. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I am sure this will clear up the problem, won't it, Curtis? >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > You are such a sweet and loveable guy. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Oh, by the way, I do believe I represented your sentiments >> > >> > > > > exactly. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I would like to hear you refute what I have said so I can >> > >> > > > > imagine how >> > >> > > > I could have been wrong here. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > If you would not have said (in principle) what i have you >> > >> > > > > saying then >> > >> > > > it means the irony did not--to use a Share word--"fly". >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > If you can sincerely show me examples of statements--in either >> > >> > > > post--which are false in their attempt to speak in your voice, I >> > >> > > > need to >> > >> > > > see them. Because, to repeat myself for the third time, it means >> > >> > > > I did >> > >> > > > not succeed in what I attempted. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Now let us love one another, Curtis. I have followed you very >> > >> > > > > closely >> > >> > > > for over a year. What i said in both posts for me was Curtis all >> > >> > > > the >> > >> > > > way. Just not as witty, not as hard-hitting, not as clever, not as >> > >> > > > colorful. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > For me, everything is forever. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Robin >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >> > >> > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing >> > >> > > > > > Robin? >> > >> > > > really? >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of >> > >> > > > > > straw >> > >> > > > men versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of >> > >> > > > us just >> > >> > > > skim posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough >> > >> > > > to keep >> > >> > > > track without this in the mix. There were many statements in what >> > >> > > > you >> > >> > > > wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If >> > >> > > > you want >> > >> > > > to play fast and lose with accuracy and just assume other people >> > >> > > > will >> > >> > > > keep up, please do it at your expense in the future,not mine. >> > >> > > > This shit >> > >> > > > we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some >> > >> > > > responsibilities. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >
