laughing yes, attentive and nurturing nurse...who practically faints at the 
sight of blood.  Could impede progress up career ladder...



________________________________
 From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:47 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my 
turn!"
 

  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ann.  Good advice and I like the metaphor.  Actually I think these 
> aspirations are merely common sense.  What else can one do given that we are 
> bound to make mistakes?  And FFL seems a concentrated reality to me, albeit 
> 2D.  In some ways, easier for burning off the karma. 
> 
> Share
> PS  Did I have a role?! 

Yes, the very attentive and nurturing nurse. 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:39 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my 
> turn!"
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, sometimes foolish, sometimes wise we are.  Because this is a 
> > learning place.  We are all going to make mistakes.  Good to develop 
> > wise compassion.  Even about ourselves.  And to apologize if 
> > appropriate.  Make amends.  Intend to do better next time.  Act 
> > wisely to mature the undeveloped aspects of ourselves.  TM, Sedona 
> > Method, mindfulness, lovingkindness, humor, ect.  Whatever helps us 
> > become a better person, more loving, more truthful.
> > 
> > This is the best anyone can do.  And it is good enough to do.  I am 
> > open to other thoughts and suggestions. 
> 
> I think, with all due respect Share, that if you want to develop and practice 
> these noble aspirations that you list above then do this in the 'real world'. 
> FFL is simply not that. Many of us are not quite as we seem here at FFL as we 
> are offline. I know this for a fact. It is like trying to practice real 
> medicine on some hospital theme soap opera.  FFL is a place to stretch some 
> boundaries, to play a little and sometimes to fight but you aren't going to 
> change anyone here and many times sincerity and vulnerability get sacrificed, 
> brutally. Don't take this place or your role in it too seriously. That would 
> be my best advice.
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: merudanda <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:59 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> > my turn!"
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > Oh Mama Aunty Share play with her kids and they won't let Share be
> > 
> > 
> > Sedon(a)-izing  her kids- demons today,
> > Letting them out for their weekly foray.
> > Sharing can't make them leave,
> > and they won't let Share be
> > if she don't let them come out to play?
> > 
> > The fat one on the slide is it Rage?
> > He was good, so he's out of the cage.
> > He doesn't play nice,
> > and sometimes, he bites;
> > Yeah, he's hard to assuage.
> > 
> > The cute one, you may like is Lust.
> > For her, the see-saw's a must.
> > But don't let her fool you,
> > she's really quite cruel, too.
> > In fact, it's her you shouldn't` trust.
> > 
> > See little one there is named Pout.
> > (Bet you guessed what he's all about.)
> > He loves to swing on wingy  swings,
> > and sometimes, breaking things,
> > if Share don't give in to her shouts.
> > 
> > Look the last one outside is Sorrow.
> > She plays with toys that are borrowed.
> > A real downer, she is.
> > Doesn't like other kids,
> > But she'll always be out again tomorrow
> > 
> > Sedonizing Share's demons today,
> > Letting them out for their weekly foray.
> > We can't make them leave.
> > Does they  let her be
> > if she don't let them come out to play?
> > 
> > Is the way into you  a narrow road?
> > Is it boxed in, blocked out, and reprimanded?
> > Is the way into you  tiny, yeah
> > Can't you get there in a single stride?
> > Can't you  get there without a guide?
> > Is the way into you
> > Is it a narrow road?
> > With goodbyes and hellos?
> > That flank each winding bend
> > so these people  want to be your friend
> > 
> > You not seek, and so you'll found;
> > Will  traveled rooted to the ground.
> > Words that in jest you uttered here
> > May wisdom in the heavenly sphere.
> > (All men's questions and replies
> > Are sometimes foolish, sometimes wise)
> > 
> > If you wish to learn of me
> > Forget all this immediately;
> > Forget there's such a thing to do -
> > And then perchance I'll wink at you.
> > Nameless mother of ten thousand things 
> > From the unlocked cage of your heart
> > White doves of love will go winging,
> > Wild larks of song golden rise singing,
> > The ice of your heart is then broken, broken,
> > Joy's fountain leaps in the air;
> > And all the while no word was spoken:
> > You'll only looked at something fair.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Ann, poor Share was at writing group for 2 hours this afternoon, 
> > > then Sedona Method for an hour, then Dome, then dinner, then library, now 
> > > here.  At one point I had over 80 unread emails.  The other forum 
> > > is also being quite active today.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Before the Dome I saw that Robin had posted what he sent me offline last 
> > > night.  In return I posted the reply I sent to him last night.  
> > > I've had a quick glance at 2 of his posts from after that.  In one of 
> > > them he says he corrected something from yesterday.  I heard a groan 
> > > in my head!  In the other he indicates that he's not satisfied with my 
> > > reconciliation efforts.  I'll read both of those more carefully this 
> > > evening.
> > > 
> > >  Having asked Robin what more I can do, I sense that I've done my 
> > > best.  It seems that is not good enough for him.  Nonetheless I 
> > > wish him all the best always.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thank you for all your kindness and support
> > > Share  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > PS  Anyone who still has discomfort about my part in all this is 
> > > welcome to email me directly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:43 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> > > my turn!"
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > Hoo boy, and I thought I was getting confused with the quotes and poems 
> > > from various "famous" authors and poets whose excerpts were being posted 
> > > here by various members. Now I have to contend with letters written by 
> > > one person using another person's name. If I'm confused you can only 
> > > imagine poor Share...let alone Steve. I think we might just be about to 
> > > hear from Curtis any minute now as well. God, this place rocks.
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > much snipping
> > > > > > > I have to think, Judy, that you would take exception to
> > > > > > > someone describing an entirely fictitious conversation
> > > > > > > with you as though it had occurred. I also think that
> > > > > > > you might take exception to someone writing posts with
> > > > > > > your byline,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (Steve has explained he didn't mean using someone else's
> > > > > > account ID.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > even if it is done in the
> > > > > > > name of so called irony.  My feeling is that you would request
> > > > > > > that such a person refrain from doing that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It would depend, Steve. And certainly Curtis and Share
> > > > > > are free to object or make such a request if they think
> > > > > > anybody might have been misled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it was obvious to me that the "conspiracy" bit and
> > > > > > the paragraph Robin wrote and signed "Curtis" were both
> > > > > > ironic. And frankly, I'd be astonished if everyone didn't
> > > > > > realize this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, I am sure everyone did realize it.  It is just something
> > > > > I would not take the liberty of doing.  Perhaps I am more
> > > > > sensitive along these lines.
> > > > 
> > > > Uh, perhaps. I guess that's one possibility.
> > > > 
> > > > > Of course Share did respond that she had not participated in
> > > > > the discussion to which Robin indicated she was a party.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, no, Steve, that wasn't what she responded. She did
> > > > contradict what Robin had said about the *nature* of the
> > > > discussion to which she had, in fact, been a party.
> > > > 
> > > > > I picked up that she wasn't too thrilled about being
> > > > > misrepresented.
> > > > 
> > > > Or, she was pleased to have found something she thought
> > > > she could use to make Robin look bad, not having
> > > > realized that, as you yourself said you were sure
> > > > about, everyone would have recognized it as irony.
> > > > 
> > > > > And also,
> > > > > > Irony is pretty easy to detect if one is in good contact
> > > > > > with reality, because the variance from reality in the
> > > > > > ironic material is clear. It's really just a matter of
> > > > > > common sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think anyone is missing the irony.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe you should tell Share this.
> > > > 
> > > > > But irony just like anything can be in good taste or poor
> > > > > taste.  In my opinion, Robin's irony sometimes crosses a
> > > > > line most people would not appreciate.
> > > > 
> > > > You're welcome to your opinion, and your taste. De gustibus
> > > > non est disputandum.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > But it may not be enough for them to make a protest.  It
> > > > > is not that big a deal for me either.  But since we were
> > > > > discussing issues along these lines, I brought it up.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


 

Reply via email to