Infinite creativity!?! Surely you jest. Come on people someone please help me out here. Infinite creativity in a system that claims harm comes to people if they don't enter a building through an east facing entrance? That if we don't live in a properly aligned home it creates all sorts of problems?
The whole point to meditating is that over time it makes you stronger, healthier etc, not more weak. But if you take the Movement's word, you are on the brink of death unless you are hopping, while gobbling amrit in a sthapatya veda flying hall. If TM is enough, then we don't need all the bells and whistles. If it ain't enough then where were all the fancy frills from 1955 till? I wonder if archaeological excavations will show all the old building in India were built according to sthapatya ved? Bet they don't. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > There is british Maharishi Vaastu and japanese style Maharishi Vastu > buildings. There is infinite creativity possible within precise rules. > Vastu buildings are also personalised to individuals nakshatra. Correct Vastu > also does not negative national differences. IF you were truly interested in > the subject and did some study these things would already be apparent. > > talking about cultural differences and natural law. > > > > In this lecture he stated the reason people are different all over the > > world was the energy of the devas. > > > > Now I mean he actually used the words deva and devas, and during the talk > > used also the term the personifications of the laws of nature > > interchangeably for devas. > > > > He said the reason people had developed different cultures, different modes > > of dress, different languages, different cultural habits and food > > preferences, in short all the aspects of a particular culture was due to > > the energy of the devas underlying that particular part of the geographical > > landscape. > > > > The devic energy or energy of the personifications of the laws of nature > > formed the energy that people would pick up on and using that energy create > > all the aspects of their culture. This accounted for cultural differences > > all over the world. It was the devas. > > > > I wonder then how that fits in with the idea of sthapatya veda where all > > the buildings must be designed and constructed the same way. > > > > Does this mean that all the devas responsible for the cultural creation of > > architecture all over the world have now become Maharishi Sthapatya Veda > > devas? Or have they just been taking lessons from the old sthapatya veda > > devas? Or is sthapatya veda unnecessary outside of India? > > > > Thoughts, anyone? > > >
