--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > Yes, cute dormouse, Ann. Not looking at all pompous or reality avoiding > > which of course were the nasty parts of the metaphor. > > Here is how I see it. You can focus on what you think of as the negative > aspects of this or the funny ones or, of course, ignore the whole thing > completely. All of these ways of dealing with the dormouse sentence are > possible.
M: I don't see you or any of us living up to this advice when the intent is directed toward us. Judy's intent has been very clear with Share and she is feeling defensive because she is being attacked. Imagine if in the beginning I gave this rap to you about Barry's posts to you. Is this realistic? I actually found myself laughing out loud at that description and I can say with all truthfulness I would have laughed just as much if it had been directed at me, which it may have been since Judy said it was not directed at you. What does focusing on the 'nasty parts of the metaphor' achieve anyway? Surely, you have the best answer to that, I know you do. So, when I read that descriptive my first impulse was to find a picture of a dormouse and look how fantastic that little creature was. > >  And so of course not the ones you mentioned. Your ignoring that does not > do you justice. > > I IGNORE nothing but I FOCUS on what is important, to me. This is how I live > my life and it is the best way I know to do myself justice. > > > > > > Plus your ignoring Judy's part in this ie her response to my apology, does > > not do you justice either. > > Share, my post to you was written with good intentions. If you, like Curtis, > think it was not then I failed in what I was trying to achieve, which was to > encourage you to stay true to who you think you are, a positive and sensitive > and thoughtful person, and not fall into the trap of lashing out in a way > that goes against who you want to be, or what you work so hard on developing > in your character in your relationship with others. But, in reality, it is > none of my business so I will, as you are so much better than I am at doing, > apologize if I wither misread you or overstepped my boundaries. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:33 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to everyone -- writing for the Church of > > $cientology > > > > > >  > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just in case Judy's use > > > of quotation marks is obfuscating, I'm sure it's not me she is quoting as > > > I did not write those words.àOr even think them.àMaybe > > > herself?àOr someone from another decade?à> > > > > > > > > PSàI'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding dormouse" than > > > a rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter.à> > > > Here is the thing, dear Share, although you have obviously taken exception > > to the metaphor of the dormouse as pertaining to you, it was a rather > > charming, in an interesting way, image and not one to get overly excited > > about. (See my photo of a rather adorable dormouse). On the other hand, I > > know you can do better in your description of Judy so that it encompasses > > not only your feelings (which seem to be hurt) as well as a degree of > > truthfulness and therefore potency without the ugly-esh negativity. I say > > this because I don't really sense that your "rageful, reality-obfuscating > > dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the justice it could if you were to dig > > a little deeper to find the one that is just right. The one that fits your > > feelings right now but doesn't do you an injustice. > > > > BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean fighting way of using quotation > > marks as the words enclosed therein were actually written by a FFL poster. > > àà> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: authfriend <authfriend@> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the Church > > > of $cientology > > > > > > > > > à> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in > > > > this disagreement.àIf anyone has questions or concerns > > > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my > > > > request is that you email me directly for sake of > > > > sparing the forum any further negativity. > > > > > > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and > > > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that." > > > > > >
