--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, cute DORMOUSE Ann.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR8LFNUr3vw

  Not looking at all pompous or reality avoiding which of course were the 
nasty parts of the metaphor.
> > 
> > Here is how I see it. You can focus on what you think of as the negative 
> > aspects of this or the funny ones or, of course, ignore the whole thing 
> > completely. All of these ways of dealing with the DORMOUSE 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxiYrSk0Wag                are possible.
> 
> M: I don't see you or any of us living up to this advice when the intent is 
> directed toward us.  Judy's intent has been very clear with Share and she is 
> feeling defensive because she is being attacked.
> 
> Imagine if in the beginning I gave this rap to you about Barry's posts to 
> you.  Is this realistic? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  I actually found myself laughing out loud at that description and I can say 
> with all truthfulness I would have laughed just as much if it had been 
> directed at me, which it may have been since Judy said it was not directed at 
> you. What does focusing on the 'nasty parts of the metaphor' achieve anyway? 
> Surely, you have the best answer to that, I know you do. So, when I read that 
> descriptive my first impulse was to find a picture of a dormouse and look how 
> fantastic that little creature was.
> > 
> >   And so of course not the ones you mentioned.  Your ignoring that does 
> > not do you justice.
> > 
> > I IGNORE nothing but I FOCUS on what is important, to me. This is how I 
> > live my life and it is the best way I know to do myself justice.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Plus your ignoring Judy's part in this ie her response to my apology, 
> > > does not do you justice either.
> > 
> > Share, my post to you was written with good intentions. If you, like 
> > Curtis, think it was not then I failed in what I was trying to achieve, 
> > which was to encourage you to stay true to who you think you are, a 
> > positive and sensitive and thoughtful person, and not fall into the trap of 
> > lashing out in a way that goes against who you want to be, or what you work 
> > so hard on developing in your character in your relationship with others. 
> > But, in reality, it is none of my business so I will, as you are so much 
> > better than I am at doing, apologize if I wither misread you or overstepped 
> > my boundaries. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:33 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to everyone -- writing for the Church of 
> > > $cientology
> > >  
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just in case Judy's 
> > > > use of quotation marks is obfuscating, I'm sure it's not me she is 
> > > > quoting as I did not write those words.  Or even think them.  
> > > > Maybe herself?  Or someone from another decade?  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > PS  I'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding dormouse" 
> > > > than a rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter. 
> > > 
> > > Here is the thing, dear Share, although you have obviously taken 
> > > exception to the metaphor of the dormouse as pertaining to you, it was a 
> > > rather charming, in an interesting way, image and not one to get overly 
> > > excited about. (See my photo of a rather adorable dormouse). On the other 
> > > hand, I know you can do better in your description of Judy so that it 
> > > encompasses not only your feelings (which seem to be hurt) as well as a 
> > > degree of truthfulness and therefore potency without the ugly-esh 
> > > negativity. I say this because I don't really sense that your "rageful, 
> > > reality-obfuscating dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the justice it 
> > > could if you were to dig a little deeper to find the one that is just 
> > > right. The one that fits your feelings right now but doesn't do you an 
> > > injustice.
> > > 
> > > BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean fighting way of using 
> > > quotation marks as the words enclosed therein were actually written by a 
> > > FFL poster.    
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >  From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the 
> > > > Church of $cientology
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in
> > > > > this disagreement.  If anyone has questions or concerns
> > > > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my
> > > > > request is that you email me directly for sake of
> > > > > sparing the forum any further negativity.
> > > > 
> > > > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and
> > > > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that."
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to