--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > I can't believe they resurrected this old routine. Not so easy > > > to spin if we look at Sal's exact words: > > > > Exact words of Sal that Curtis did not want us to look > > at, for obvious reasons (Sal responding to Susan in the > > same thread, same day): > > M: Yes if you don't include every post in the thread, it > is a plot. Unfortunately for Judy, this just confirms > the facts of what was going on.
Caught lying, Curtis declares victory. We've seen it before. <snip> > What now do I post every post in this thread now or just > wait for Judy to post them one by one to try to dig herself > out of this? No, now that I've posted the one you carefully omitted, your burial is complete. Obviously I don't believe your claim not to have known about that one. You tangled with raunchy about this in March, so it's vanishingly unlikely you didn't remember it. And even if you hadn't, if you had any integrity you would have done your due diligence and checked out the rest of Sal's posts in the thread, since the one you quoted was obviously not what raunchy had been referring to. > > ===== > > [Sal:] > > Well, yeah. Or any of a variety of other things that > > don't sound like she's expecting a bunch of 8-year olds > > to show up. First time I can recall such a pathetic, > > juvenile inducement to come somewhere. Only in this town. > > M: Confirming that what as funny was a bunch of adults coming to a party > advertizing cookies as the draw. It was not bullying some poor person who > had a tragedy. Remember that TM celebrations involve cake for adults, so this > snarkiness has a long history for people out of the TM mindset. > > > > > On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Susan wrote: > > > > > I think Sal meant only that champagne and wine are usually > > > the beverage of choice at art shows, not cookies and milk. > > > Hope Jennifer can seel some of her work. ARtists rarely > > > have it easy. > > M: And Susan with out the get Sal agenda read it right. > > > ===== > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/296974 > > > > Curtis's spin (remember, he saw the above post too > > when he went to look up the ones he wanted to show us): > > M: No I didn't I typed in her name and the one I posted came up first. But > of course it doesn't matter at all. It is just a Judy mindreading spin to > try to make me look bad through malicious imagination. > > > > > > M: Yeah that's Ol Sal the bully making fun of cookies and > > > milk at Fairfield events again. Poor cookies and milk, > > > how can they stand this abuse? > > > > > > So what was Raunchy's comment about the above interaction > > [now below--JS]: > > > > > > " When artist, Jennifer Blair lost everything in a fire Sal > > > heartlessly, gratuitously, derided a fundraiser for her." > > > > > > M: Yeah, nothing to apologize for there, I remember the > > > weeping and wailing of those poor Ginger Snaps. Glad they > > > have two people to stick up for them here on FFL. If they > > > don't hold the line next there will be snickering over the > > > Snicker Doodles. > > > > To make it crystal clear: Curtis chose to quote only Sal's > > more benign remarks, omitting the ones raunchy had been > > referring to that I just quoted. > > > > Let's look at them once again: > > > > "Well, yeah. Or any of a variety of other things that > > don't sound like she's expecting a bunch of 8-year olds > > to show up. First time I can recall such a pathetic, > > juvenile inducement to come somewhere. Only in this town." > > > > So Curtis lied blatantly in order to take a shot at > > raunchy and me. > > > > M: Amazing but expected. I'll let the reader decide. > > > It wasn't cookies and milk Sal had been > > deriding, it was Jennifer herself; and it wasn't > > "Fairfield events" in general, it was Jennifer's > > fundraiser specifically--the "first time" Sal could > > recall such behavior. > > M: So goofing on a person who put out the cookies rather than the cookies > themselves is your big reveal? Judy world is a wonder unto itself amen. > > Judy: > > > > And these derisive remarks, which raunchy characterized > > accurately as heartless and gratuitous, were made by Sal > > *after she had learned of the fire in which Jennifer had > > lost everything*. > > M: Why compound your transparent malice toward Sal by showing up as an idiot > as well? Your choice. > > Judy: > > > > No wonder Curtis didn't want us to see them. > > M: How magically your mind must work to know such a thing! > > What now do I post every post in this thread now or just wait for Judy to > post them one by one to try to dig herself out of this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #296961 > > > On Nov 30, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: > > > >>> Hello everyone: > > > >>> > > > >>> We wanted to let you know that you have another chance to see > > > >>> Jennifer's ceramics and paintings at our house this Thursday > > > >>> night, 1 December, at 7pm. See map attached. > > > >>> > > > >>> We will provide cookies and milk. > > > >> > > > > > > Sal: > > > > > > >> Presumably along with lollipops, balloons, > > > >> and a game of duck-duck-goose as well. > > > >> Unbelievable. > > > >> > > > >> Sal > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Alex: > > > > That's Jennifer Blair, whose studio was in the Depot Building that just > > > > burned > > > to the ground. What is so unbelievable about trying to raise some money > > > after > > > experiencing a loss like that? > > > > > > Sal: > > > > > > Nothing at all, Alex, and it should be obvious that's > > > not what I meant. Jesus! Clearly I didn't know that~~ > > > it wasn't obvious from the email, you know. I just meant the cookies and > > > milk > > > bit. Well, I hope she raises some. > > > > > > Sal > > >
