--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> <snip> I strongly suspect that this has a great deal to do 
> with the differences one sees in scans of his brain.
> 
> Training?  Meditation? 

NOT what TMers think of as meditation. In Buddhist 
techniques, *some* meditations involve going with
the flow and effortlessness, and others involve
developing the ability to focus, concentrate, and
gain from *that* use of the brain's capacities.
TMers miss all of that.

> ________________________________
>  From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:01 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is this the world's happiest man? Brain scans 
> reveal French monk found to have 'abnormally large capacity' for joy, and it 
> could be down to meditation | Mail Online
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2225634/Is-worlds-happiest-man-Brain-scans-reveal-French-monk-abnormally-large-capacity-joy-meditation.html
> 
> I've actually seen Matthieu Ricard do his thing, while
> translating for the Dalai Lama or other Tibetan teachers,
> and have always wondered how much of his "brain plasticity"
> is the result of how "simultaneous translation" is done
> in that context. 
> 
> Translating for a Tibetan Buddhist teacher is *NOT* the
> way you see it done at the UN. Instead of translating 
> phrase by phrase, the translator sits quietly beside 
> the teacher, listening but taking no notes, and allowing
> the teacher to speak as long as he wants. Then, when the
> teacher pauses, the translator relates what the teacher
> said, in a different language. 
> 
> The teacher could have been talking for two minutes or
> twelve, but the translators seem to always (according
> to people I know who are bilingual in Tibetan and English)
> spot-on, and perfect. Nothing left out, nothing added, 
> and nothing mistranslated. Being chosen to be the trans-
> lator for a Tibetan teacher is considered a teaching
> in itself, developing the ability to DO THIS.
> 
> I strongly suspect that this has a great deal to do with
> the differences one sees in scans of his brain.
>


Reply via email to