I don't get it. Am I the only one that sees 2 bad options in this election?
The slogan is 'elect coherence'. This implies that there is a coherent candidate running for President. This also implies that the TMO must have in mind who they think the more coherent candidate is. When the choice is a bowl of shit or a bottle of piss, you're already beyond the need for an increase in coherence. What the TMO should've done is increased coherence DURING THE PRIMARIES back in 2008 so we would have COHERENT CHOICES IN THE FIRST PLACE! Now it's too damn late. We have one candidate who doesn't deserve re-election, and another candidate who doesn't really have an answer that I can tell from as to how we're going to fix this country. I know there are independant candidates out there, but there is no amount of group meditation that's going to get them elected, so forget it for now. I don't get the TMO at all. What are they thinking? "Hey, let's wait till the last minute when there are no half decent candidates around, and then make a big dramatic slogan that justifies our warped logic that we're the saviours of our world by influencing our choice of execution". seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Dick Mays <dickmays@...> wrote: > > VIEW EMAIL WITH IMAGES > Dear Dick, >
