Explaining Socialism to a Republican/Libertarian:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/12/11/explaining-socialism-to-a-republican/

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> Look it up.  Nixon also started that "commie" organization the EPA.  And 
> if you are to believe a scene in "Frost/Nixon" he didn't much care for 
> the rich either.  My how times have changed.
> 
> On 12/11/2012 01:58 PM, Share Long wrote:
> > Ok, that one grabs my attention.  Really?  Nixon proposed a guaranteed 
> > annual income?!  Do you think it was merely a political move?
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >   From: Bhairitu <noozguru@...>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Voter Frustration Over Politicians
> >   
> >
> >    
> > Who says that people who cannot find work are lazy?  There are plenty of
> > well qualified workers who can't find work.  There isn't enough work for
> > the working population.
> >
> > How are we subsidizing poverty?  You know who the biggest welfare
> > recipients are?  The military industrial complex.  So let's start there
> > if you want to stop welfare.
> >
> > OTOH, I'm all for stipends for everyone or what was once called a
> > "guaranteed annual income" proposed by that old "commie" ..... Richard
> > M. Nixon.
> >
> > On 12/11/2012 11:20 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
> >> But isn't that what Clinton wanted? Remember the good 'ol days of 
> >> government prosperity? Raising taxes on the *rich*, back to Clinton 
> >> levels, will only run the Gubment another 8 days a year. Let's screw 
> >> everybody, especially the poor. It's time to stop subsidizing poverty. The 
> >> more the government subsidizes poverty , the more of it we get. I'd like 
> >> to see those earning below the poverty line paying MORE in taxes than 
> >> those earning just  above that line. If we can discourage people from bad 
> >> behavior like smoking, drinking ,driving and being comfortable in home and 
> >> workplace, through higher taxes, then we should do the same for being 
> >> lazy. Tax the *F* out of those able, but unwilling, to work.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>    From: John <jr_esq@...>
> >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:13 AM
> >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Voter Frustration Over Politicians
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It should be clear to everyone by now that the Republicans are not going 
> >> to approve any higher tax rate for the wealthy.  As such, they will let 
> >> the Bush Tax Cut legislation expire.  And, we'll be stuck with paying 
> >> higher income taxes beginning on January 1, 2013.
> >>
> >> http://news.yahoo.com/voter-disdain-spreads-fiscal-cliff-looms-085417763--finance.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to