--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably > > > > > wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it > > > > > than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to > > > > > clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use > > > > > which did not include the word negative. > > > > > > > > That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) > > > > "less than completely positive." > > > > > > > > (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you > > > > while you blow your nose.) > > > > > > From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... > > > > > > "Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect > > > her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting > > > with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel > > > threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all > > > by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be > > > brought to her attention." > > > > > > ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and > > > indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last > > > very long.) > > > > > > BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a "far from positive" discussion > > > with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was > > > expressing himself to dumbass? > > > > I don't think so as she replied to Nabby : > > "dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann." > > Post 329456 > > > > Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to > > her? > > > > And given myself away how, oh Laughing One? That I thought I was being > > negative? No, I do not think it nor was it my intention. Curtis and I were > > having an adult and civilized conversation and hence I was surprised that > > Share thought it was negative from my side. I can certainly be negative but > > I don't think even Curtis would agree that I was this time. He appeared to > > be cool with it all but you never can tell around here sometimes. > > > > Or are both Judy and Ann "in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts > > are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is > > no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought"? > > > > I think if anyone is guilty of lack of thought, or shall we just say simple > > powers of observation, it is the gull this time around. > > Maybe dumbass is on to something here... > > You are correct Ann as I recognized in: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329493, that believe it > or not, I actually posted before reading your post above. (Judy's was first > in the queue and I responded to her after re-reading the exchange where I > found the clarifying sentence.) Jeez woman, you are quick, but I would rather > you had waited for me to rise to Judy's challenge before giving it away...I > was so proud of myself and am glad that I didn't read your give-away first. > Anyway, my apologies for the mistake although I thought other parts were > somewhat humorous, n'est-ce pas?
Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say "I told you so!" > > > > > > > > >  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not > > > > what I would call easy to understand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "Earnest Confusion" to Nablusoss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. > > > > > > > > > > Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my > > > > > interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on > > > > > my part? > > > > > > > > > > àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an > > > > > artist.àNot easy in this day and age.à> > > > > > > > > > > > I think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the > > > > > > unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it > > > > > > doesn't bother me the way that it used to.à> > > > > > > > > > > > OTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the > > > > > > lips of Sheryl Crow (-:à> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope > > > > > > that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack > > > > > > ofàpro TM words on FFL. à> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "Earnest Confusion" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > à> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies > > > > > > > > carefully because I know I can learn something from > > > > > > > > you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less > > > > > > > > than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not > > > > > > > > saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he "sings" > > > > > > during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). > > > > > > Besides being president in the hate club > > > > > > "gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life" this is what curtis > > > > > > does to scrape by: > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
