Whoa, deja vu dude.  

> You have a metaphysical complacency--unconscious as this is--which always 
> deprives you of any kind of real terror or beauty in the form of a 
> self-discovery.>

Getting a bit formulaic eh?





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote:
>
> There is a perfection to what you are oblivious to in all your posts, lg.
> 
> Your problem is this: You have lost the capacity to sense what you just might 
> be anaesthetized to in your apprehension of what is going on.
> 
> It's starts with your conception and experience of yourself: your self is way 
> too known to yourself to have been created by something other than yourself.
> 
> You have a metaphysical complacency  --unconscious as this is--which always 
> deprives you of any kind of real terror or beauty in the form of a 
> self-discovery.
> 
> Look at the reflexive way you are processing this very post of mine: there 
> you have exactly what I am trying to tell you: You subvert any chance of 
> being in the unknown, and therefore your responses are always tediously 
> predictable to your soul--which is finding you a bore.
> 
> The malady of the quotidian laughinggull.
> 
> I knew you would enjoy this.
> 
> And remember: the first order of response is to defend yourself, find a 
> rejoinder, mount some counterattack.
> 
> Never to let something get into you which will or might alter your experience 
> of yourself and reality.
> 
> Don't mind me, laughinggull: I compensate for my congenital mediocrity by 
> trying to be much more interesting and provocative than I have a right to be.
> 
> My life is just very dull.
> 
> Forgive me.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > One additional response inserted below:
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Feste too. But you're *really* stupid.
> > > > 
> > > > <snip>
> > > > 
> > > > Feste, we both got off easy in the above from our dear Judy;
> > > > IMO, I got off just a bit easier. I received a mere harsh
> > > > glance whereas you received a slap on the wrist. However, we
> > > > both avoided a good ol' fashioned ass-whoopin'. You see, she
> > > > only called me "stupid" (less favorable) but spelled it
> > > > correctly (more favorable); same for you, however, she added
> > > > the adverb "really" (less favorable), again spelled correctly
> > > > (more favorable), then used asterisks for emphasis (less
> > > > favorable).
> > > 
> > > Er, laughinggull, I'm not sure why you thought the "you"
> > > in "you're" above referred to feste rather than you. It
> > > did not.
> > > 
> > > > This got me to thinking (!) and, being a slow day at work 
> > > > yesterday, I found myself becoming more proficient in the
> > > > use of the "advanced search" function on FFL. Below are
> > > > some of my findings:
> > > 
> > > Also not clear, especially when you went to such trouble to
> > > compile links to examples, why you believe they're all a
> > > function of my having asked someone (usually Barry) a 
> > > question. I'll take a wild guess: You didn't actually read
> > > the examples you cited.
> > > 
> > > In any case, while links by themselves can look impressive,
> > > it's even more impressive to check the posts themselves.
> > > Because if you do, you will find that I do not use the
> > > adjective "STOOOOOOOOOPID" lightly.
> > 
> > That last sentence defines exactly our differences in how each of us 
> > approaches this forum. You really *do* take it seriously, don't you? *Not* 
> > using adjectives lightly...would that be heavily or harshly? Lighten up 
> > Judy!
> > 
> > > 
> > > (By "you" in the paragraph immediately above, I don't mean laughinggull; 
> > > I mean those readers who are not themselves
> > > STOOOOOOOOOOOOPID.)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Few have tried but none can match the skill and artistry of our dear 
> > > > Judy in calling someone stupid on this forum...to put it simply, she 
> > > > *is* and will *always be* the one true master.
> > > > 
> > > > When Judy wants you to pay attention (like a fifth-grade student with 
> > > > his head on his desk abrupty awakened from a stolen nap, and lifting 
> > > > his head in confusion thinking "Did Miss Stein just ask me 
> > > > something?"), she mispells "stupid" as "stoopid". The number of "o"s 
> > > > used varies from as few as two up to a whopping eighteen and is 
> > > > dependent on how much attention she wishes to garner from you:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272412
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253194
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/225008
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/279466
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/276580
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328630
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/261112.
> > > > 
> > > > My research also indicates that our dear Judy is the only poster on FFL 
> > > > to have attempted using "stoopider" or "stoopidest", again with varying 
> > > > number of "o"s, as in:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247574
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/177467.
> > > > I humbly bow to the master.
> > > > 
> > > > By the time she starts attaching "really", again misspelled as "reely" 
> > > > with varying number of "e"s, to her "stoopid", it becomes suddenly and 
> > > > abundantly clear to that fifth-grade student who has just awakened from 
> > > > his stolen nap that, yes indeedy, Miss Stein has definitely asked him a 
> > > > question, and not only that, fully expects him to answer or else face 
> > > > the consequences:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163836
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/251793
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/270344
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/272653.
> > > > 
> > > > That fifth-grade begins furtively glancing around looking for an escape 
> > > > route when Miss Stein begins adding extra "l"s (this doesn't happen 
> > > > often as I think it might be reserved for very special cases) in the 
> > > > misspelling of "reeellly", and/or using several repetitions of "reely", 
> > > > again with varying number of "e"s (happens frequently):
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291538
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/291102
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/193884
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/292164
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/323593
> > > > and how can I not draw attention to what will now become infamous:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/247573.
> > > > Everyone, *on your knees*.
> > > > 
> > > > Hearsay from past students tells the tale of Miss Stein once going so 
> > > > far as to use asterisks to add emphasis to her misspelling of several 
> > > > repetitions of "reeellly" with both a large number of extra "e"s *and* 
> > > > "l"s, henceforth referred to as the "perfect storm" in literary 
> > > > circles, and the two students to whom this brutality was directed were 
> > > > heard muttering, "Oh, the inhumanity, the inhumanity!" and "Dear God, 
> > > > help me Jesus, dear God, help me Jesus!". Well, dear readers, legend 
> > > > becomes fact as I present to you the following from my research:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/194019.
> > > > Man, my ass is stinging from just reading that. We know that Barry 
> > > > survived but does anyone know how do.rflex is doing?
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, feste, I'd say we both got off reeelll easy with Miss Stein. Now 
> > > > we can go back to sleep and finish that stolen nap. Sweet dreams...
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to