--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I think what you'd find if you looked into it is that > > > > > > the higher the altar they've put Maharishi on, the > > > > > > less time they've actually spent in his presence. > > > > > > Judy has never even been in the same room with the > > > > > > man, after 30+ years of devoted TM practice. > > > > > > > > > > You just disproved your own formula, because I've > > > > > *never* put MMY on an altar. The rest of your > > > > > rant is equally misapplied; I don't believe *any* > > > > > of the things you (or Paul) attribute to me. > > > > > Not one. > > > > > > > > Yeah, right, babe. That's why you couldn't > > > > bring yourself to answer Shemp's questions > > > > about whether you'd still have learned TM > > > > if the TM movement of today was the one you > > > > had run into 30 years ago. > > > > > > Complete non sequitur, sorry. > > > > > > Who are you trying to fool, Barry, other than > > > yourself? > > > > Shemp posed a rather simple question to answer. > > And I think that everyone here knows that your > > answer, like theirs, would consist of one word, > > containing only two letters. > > > > The fact that you cannot bring yourself to utter > > that word speaks volumes about the pedestal on > > which you have placed Maharishi. IMO, of course. > > And it's not that I want to "attack" Judy or "one-up" her...it's > because I truly believe that this sort of dialogue should be > happening in the TMO. And, to a certain extent, we on this > newsgroup are connected to the TMO and they could benefit from that > dialogue.
Yet you won't fulfill my simple request to explain the relevance of your question to what I had said in the post you were responding to. Shemp, I think everyone here realizes, despite your and Barry's best attempts at demonization, that I haven't answered your question because it was rhetorical, not a genuine request for information. Barry even suggests as much above when he says everybody knows what my answer would be. So both you and he are being disingenuous to pretend you think I "can't bring myself" to answer. You can't start a dialogue by stating a given and then insisting that folks accede to it. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
