I see Buck as a Stephen Colbert-type figure. He plays a certain role here but 
what he really believes is a different matter. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, what Turq said!  
> > 
> > Bucky, before I die, can you at least just send me a private email telling 
> > me you're a living parody and not the nutcase you come off as?  I won't 
> > tell anyone!  
> > 
> > Edg
> 
> Dear Edg,
> 
> No one will ever know if I'm nutcase or just jerking your chain. I'm not sure 
> about it myself, so why spoil the fun? 
> 
> Buck in the dome.
> 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Damned apostate meditators.
> > > > Well, I must admit here in considering this that being 
> > > > practical as an experienced and an old practiced meditator 
> > > > on FFL I find myself sorting by apostasy and deleting 
> > > > through posts for merit to read by whether the writers are 
> > > > meditators or not meditators at all, whether being disciplined 
> > > > practicing meditators or not, being just critical meditators 
> > > > or apostate and non-meditators. It saves a lot of precious 
> > > > time spiritually.  
> > > > 
> > > > For after all what spiritually speaking could non-meditators 
> > > > or even apostate meditators who quit along the way possibly 
> > > > have to say anyway..  
> > > 
> > > "Buck," I'm replying because you captured perfectly the
> > > mindset I was trying to explain to Share earlier. 
> > > 
> > > Can you actually *remember* what you signed up for when
> > > you first started TM? I can. It was "20 minutes twice a
> > > day of meditation, with no required lifestyle changes, 
> > > and no mandatory things you must believe in or do." 
> > > 
> > > There also was no hint in those early days (1967) that
> > > TM would make you "better" than other people, such that
> > > you'd someday come to believe that if they didn't do 
> > > the things you do and believe the things you believe, 
> > > you consider them not even capable of having anything 
> > > to say. 
> > > 
> > > Compare and contrast to your talk of apostasy, which
> > > just REEKS of elitism. Somewhere along the way you got
> > > so brainwashed that you seem to believe (or pretend to
> > > believe...it's hard to tell with you) that believing
> > > the shit you believe and doing the shit you do is so 
> > > great that not only everyone should do it, everyone 
> > > HAS to do it to be worthy of interacting with you.
> > > 
> > > That just makes you a fanatic, and an elitist one at
> > > that, not more "evolved" or "better" in any way. 
> > > 
> > > You speak of "apostasy," as if those who signed up
> > > for vanilla TM "owe" something to either Maharishi
> > > (who is...uh...dead, if you hadn't noticed) or to the
> > > soulless dweebs who run things in his absence. Or even
> > > worse, to the world, because being a TM meditator 
> > > you're so...so...SO special and all. Y'know...as in
> > > the literal TM dogma that practicing the sidhis in
> > > a group makes your thoughts "10,000 times more power-
> > > ful" than other people's. What insanity.
> > > 
> > > Can you even comprehend how elitist this is? Can you
> > > comprehend how classically CULT THINKING it is? 
> > > 
> > > I read the things you write and I just roll my eyes.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to