On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ravi Chivukula
<chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Deja vu and time to ignore Barry - we have lost him for a while, just give
> him time, he's obsessing - I have lived with a person like him and trust me
> it sounds very hard for normal people to understand, was hard for me to
> understand but once these people drift off into paranoid, delusional
> territory it's very hard for them to switch off - it's a mental disability,
> so I totally understand.
>

Considering Barry is intelligent and creative it's such a shame he can't
get some treatment for his mental disability.


>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Barry, this is like a deja vu moment.  You've posted that website at
>> least twice, maybe three times that I can recall.  I find Judy's
>> highlighted quotes on their face absolutely hilarious.  I really do.  This
>> is so passe, as are your constant attempts to cite statistics that prove
>> something.  Obviously, the forum determined posting limits were a good idea
>> - they were in place before I got here.  I've been booted for a week more
>> than most regular posters here for going over the limit, a few times by
>> accident and also a few times on purpose.  They work and I like them and
>> that's the current reality.  What are you trying to prove again?
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
>> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 9:47 AM
>>
>> *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Best article on cyberstalking I've read
>> in quite some while
>>
>>
>>  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>> >
>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>> > >
>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The article clearly explained that one of the tactics of
>> > > > > the stalker was obsessive flooding with emails. This
>> > > > > corresponds directly to some behavior here, as flooding
>> > > > > with posts can occur here.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please, don't be ridiculous...."flooding" up to 50?
>> > > > Posts in a row is not "obsessive flooding."
>> > >
>> > > Emily, don't show your newbie ignorance. The very
>> > > reason there is a posting limit is BECAUSE of Judy
>> > > and a couple of other posters, who used to flood
>> > > this forum with hundreds of posts per month. Between
>> > > the three of them, they often accumulated over a
>> > > third of all the posts made to FFL. When asked to
>> > > stop, and voluntarily cut down on their excessive
>> > > (and almost always obsessive, in that they were
>> > > stalking one person or another) posting, they all
>> > > refused. Rick wisely invented the posting limit,
>> > > and that is the ONLY reason she posts as little
>> > > as she does today.
>> >
>> > Just as a reminder of the "Bad Old Days," from
>> > post #121696, back in November, 2006, before
>> > the posting limits were imposed:
>> >
>> > > Total posts: 4672
>> > >
>> > > shempmcgurk -- 541 (11.6%)
>> > > sparaig -- 533 (11.4%)
>> > > authfriend -- 482 (10.3%)
>> > > new.morning -- 265 (5.7%)
>> > > off_world_beings -- 253 (5.4%)
>> > > turquoiseb -- 218 (4.7%)
>> > >
>> > > Again, the "top three" account for a third
>> > > of all posts. And again, they'll take no
>> > > notice of this. So far in November, they
>> > > account for 47% of all posts made.
>> >
>> > Please note that my total was little more than
>> > we would have today, with the 50-post-per-week
>> > limit.
>> >
>> > Shemp has since left the forum, and when sparaig
>> > posts, he clearly has his OCD under control now,
>> > and posts only a reasonable number of comments
>> > before disappearing again.
>> >
>> > Judy has made BY FAR more posts than any other
>> > person to this forum, approximately 22,650 of
>> > them, a cumulative average of 8 posts per day
>> > for 7.7 years. Of those, 7574 (33.4%) mention
>> > "Barry" OR "Turquoiseb," 2976 (13.1%) mention
>> > "Vaj," and 2659 (11.7%) mention "Curtis."
>> >
>> > Nope, no stalking there. :-)
>> >
>> > 2279 of those posts (10%) contain the words "lie"
>> > OR "liar" OR "lying". It's basically her mantra. :-)
>>
>> And let us not forget the "tribute" site created
>> by one of her stalking victims over on alt.
>> meditation.transcendental, before she came here
>> to continue stalking people who had left that
>> forum. Andrew Skolnick was a prize-winning journalist
>> who didn't like TM very much, so that meant that Judy
>> didn't like *him* very much. Andrew chose to reply
>> to her stalking by preserving *her own words* and
>> those of a few of her supporters on this website:
>>
>> http://www.aaskolnick.com/junkyarddog/
>>
>> Read through a few of her quotes from that pre-FFL
>> era. See if you find any difference whatsoever
>> between her tactics and language then, and now.
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>

Reply via email to