Mr. Price, Oooooooow. Bait and hook me! Fog is my favorite color! I like the Purple, purple, purple stiletto books, size 11. Plum heels, size 11 too. Concord grape stretch suede boots, size 11. Roberto Cavalli, half boot, same size. ..and any other open toe meant to be worn airborne, please.. Would put me at six feet tall with those!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price wrote: > > Obba, > > Any man able to fog a mirror would know only a city as great as Manhattan could contain > a woman of your qualities; TB is still upset about getting caught mood making while > he was doing PUJA, if he had any class, he'd offer to buy you a new pair of shoes: > > http://pinterest.com/priscill/outrageous-shoes/ > > âLove looks not with the > eyes, but with the mind, > And therefore is winged Cupid > painted blind.â > > -A Midsummer Night's Dream. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX2wybAIAHU > > > > ________________________________ > From: obbajeeba > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 4:41:18 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best article on cyberstalking I've read in quite some while > > > > > Lipstick does not remove a dick. > > Unless the bitch licks with a strap on? > > (last I read, Barry appears to still be a man, regardless the shade he glamors his lips with.) > LOL > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote: > > > > If he had the lipstick on, wouldn't the roles be reversed, wrt the dog? I dunno -- Once you threw cross dressing and/or gender bending into the mix, it became weirder than a david lynch movie. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba  wrote: > > > > > > Turq, > > > In a sexy way, I thought you were pretty smart, cute, etc. > > > Now, it is like I caught you putting lipstick on and fucking the dog. hahaha. > > > Ex-Patiot http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/why-the-ex-patriot-a\ ct-is-a-creepy-law/257368/ > > > > > > Number two: I do not live in Fairfield. Never have, never will. > > > > > > Number three: The "Jobs"  or employers you mentioned. I would never apply for, and if I was hired, it would be from headhunters begging me to come and work for their clients. :) > > > > > > Social security will not exist by the time I get to "have it." > > > > > > Dear, you could send more private emails to me and we can share pictures, then you won't say nothin.  LOL > > > > > > Peace handsome > > > > > > -Obba > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba  wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Barry, I mean, Turq. No one cyberstalks on FFL. > > > > > It is fair exchange of knowledge and ignorance. > > > > > Knowledge, by which you ignore and play accusation games. > > > > > Judy is not a cyberstalker. You would fall in a minor > > > > > sort of that category by trying to claim any statements > > > > > on this board are attempting to derail a person's "cyber > > > > > history," for future employer's eyes. hahaha. Pointing > > > > > fingers all day long, month after month, year after year, > > > > > yawn, would bore any "employer." Any "employer," who > > > > > would base hiring on any of these posts would be someone, > > > > > no one should work for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  LOL. What grant > > > > > department did they earn their business dollars???? LOL. > > > > > Any entrepreneur who develops their own company without > > > > > outside governmental aid, would see right past all the > > > > > bullshit. Any others, are not worthy the tax dollar > > > > > wasted supporting their authority? lol. > > > > > > > > I understand now why you live in Fairfield. You would > > > > never be able to survive in the real world. In recent > > > > studies, 80% of all employers surveyed said that they > > > > perform Internet background searches on all potential > > > > employees, examining their posts on Google, Facebook, > > > > Yahoo, Twitter, etc. Many government jobs *require* > > > > that such a search be performed. > > > > > > > > > Turq, one day there may be a requirement, to collect your > > > > > social security, you have to be in living within the 50 > > > > > US States, if you post on the internet on forums, in > > > > > case we are all funding terrorists living abroad as > > > > > ex patriots!!!!!!!!!!!! :) Just saying, dear. Love you. OXO > > > > > > > > Unlike you, I will never need to rely on American Social > > > > Security. Nor, hopefully, ever need to live in your third > > > > world bankrupt nation again. :-) > > > > > > > > BTW, the word is expatriate, not "ex patriot." I have > > > > never been a patriot, and would sooner die than be > > > > considered one. > > > > > > > > "If I had to choose between betraying my friend or my > > > > country, I hope I'd have the guts to betray my country." > > > > - E.M. Forster > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"  wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote: > > > > > > > > They can't hold their own, so they portray themselves as > > > > > > > > victims. And they bring nothing but dishonor on themselves > > > > > > > > by doing so--especially since they themselves are far more > > > > > > > > guilty of the behavior they complain about than the folks > > > > > > > > they claim are victimizing them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not so sure about that. I searched for the word victim > > > > > > > and victimized in Barry's posts to see how he applied the > > > > > > > word to himself, and he does not seem to have used the word > > > > > > > in reference to himself. There were some 400+ references to > > > > > > > the word 'victim' and some 41 for the word 'victimize'. As > > > > > > > I have a limited time, I chose the word 'victimized' and > > > > > > > read every paragraph where he used the word in an original > > > > > > > post. This provides a reasonable sample. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In not one case does he refer to himself as having been > > > > > > > victimized. I really do not think he thinks of himself > > > > > > > that way. > > > > > > > > > > > > He does not. Thinking of the people one stalks AS > > > > > > victims is something that stalkers do. Their fantasies > > > > > > revolve around how strongly they are affecting the > > > > > > people they hate. > > > > > > > > > > > > In my considered opinion, the best thing one can do > > > > > > when faced with an Internet stalker is to allow them > > > > > > to fantasize about how strongly they are affecting > > > > > > you (something they would do anyway), while not allow- > > > > > > ing anything they say to affect you at all. Drives > > > > > > them crazy. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > The other thing it is important to know about stalkers > > > > > > is what the "end point" or "goal" of their game plan > > > > > > is. That is, put very simply, to get you to respond > > > > > > to them one-to-one so that in their diseased minds > > > > > > they can have a Robin-like "confrontation" with you. > > > > > > It *doesn't matter* what you say when replying to them. > > > > > > They already creamed their pants the moment you replied. > > > > > > So don't. It's meaner.  :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    >
