I'm just pointing out that the hero of the poor managed to amass a 2 billion fortune for him and his family, and if things go as they usually do, his family will live like aristocrats and have little concern with the masses.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > On 03/05/2013 08:03 PM, seventhray27 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: > >> On 03/01/2013 12:28 PM, John wrote: > >>> He wanted to play a powerful role of the politics in South America. > > It appears that destiny has other plans for him. > >>> http://news.yahoo.com/hugo-ch-vez-not-dead-hes-close-050515351.html > >> Hopefully his spirit will remain and others continue his cause of > > making > >> South America for the people and not just a few rich assholes. > > Does that apply to the estimated 2 billion dollar fortune he amassed for > > him and his family. How exactly does that figure into the equation? > > A measly 2 billion? What about the Koch brothers? What about Warrne > Buffet? What about Bill Gates? What about George Lucas (also a > billionaire in case you didn't know)? I suppose Chavez was fighting > fire with fire. Personally I think billionairism is a disease and no > one should have an estate worth more than a few million dollars. > > Actually Chavez was kinda wacky but he kept the Venezuelan oil > billionaires guessing until they figured out how to game him a bit. But > I liked how he was a thorn in the side of US intervention and > exploitation of South America. And of course US goons will now be up to > more mischief in that country now that Chavez is gone. > > Or are you going to march lockstep with the Tea Party crowd? I hope not. >
