--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > "This is compared to [Judy's] nemesis Barry who was not only certified to > teach it, but promoted through the ranks to supervise other teacher's > presentation of the programs." > > Your statement above, Curtis, is both disingenuous, and pretty arrogant. > Doesn't begin to approach the standards of your much vaunted science-y > approach. Here's da fax, jack: > > Judy's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 years ago)
Doesn't affect your conclusion, DrD, but actually only since 1975, and I can't claim to have been 100 percent regular in my practice (although I have been on quite a few rounding courses--whether that makes up for the sessions I've missed, I have no idea). - Not speculation, not bullshit, not conjecture - > Daily practice x 2 = 31,390 sessions since 1970. > > Barry's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 years ago) - Not > speculation, not bullshit, not conjecture - > Daily practice x 2 = ZERO sessions since 1970. > > ZERO TM by Barry in the last *43* years, vs. thirty one thousand, three > hundred and ninety TM sessions by Judy, and yet, you continue to hold up > Barry, as THE EXPERT? > > Now, perhaps you see what I mean about belief (which is all your stance on > Barry's TM expertise is based on), being unhelpful in a current assessment of > reality. > > Barry may be the most prolific bullshitter on here regarding what he thinks > about TM, etc. but despite your supposed focus on how to validate knowledge, > it is plainly obvious to the rest of us, that given his complete absence of > experience with TM over the last four and a half decades, he does not *know* > what he is talking about. Literally.
