--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Ooopsie yourself, Jude. The post of Nabby's I quoted from was > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/337936 > to which you have *still* never replied.
As you know, I responded to the earlier one, #337752. Obviously no need for me to respond *twice* to the same claim. Barry, you always make it worse for yourself when you try to wiggle out of one of your lies. > Will you apologize? Yeah, right. :-) No, I really don't think I'll be apologizing for *your* lies. Don't forget, there's also the huge one you told about my exchange with Curtis. Just imagine having to enter the Bardo with the countless malicious lies you've told in Web forums, and almost certainly in "real life" as well, all piled on your head. That won't be so very long from now, will it? > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > Barry is pissed off because I called him on his > > egregious lies about my exchange with Curtis. So > > what does he do? He lies some more and claims I > > never commented on the post of Nabby's he goes on > > to quote. > > > > Did he think I'd have forgotten my own post? Did > > he think I wouldn't quote it? > > > > Why would he make a false claim that's so easily > > disproved? > > > > His brains have turned to mush. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Just for fun, isn't it fascinating how the person who > > > jumps on any nitpick or error posted by the people she > > > doesn't like seems to...uh...accidentally overlook the > > > same thing when people "on her side" post...uh...less > > > than factual statements here. > > > > > > *Especially* if they happen to be less than factual > > > statements about one of her known enemies, the people > > > she stalks here on a regular basis and encourages others > > > to stalk, too. If one of *them* posted something this > > > inaccurate (and she knows that it's inaccurate), she'd > > > call them LIARS! at the top of her voice. But when one > > > of her clique does it, especially in the course of > > > dumping on someone she has actively encouraged them > > > to dump on, it's just fine, and doesn't warrant > > > either a correction or a comment. For example: > > > > From my response to the post of Nabby's that > > Barry quotes as an "example": > > > > "I don't know whether that's really the case, Nabs.... > > > > "My familiarity with what teachers are taught that is *not* > > taught to the rank-and-file, however, is limited to the > > various beans that TM teachers (mostly former) have > > spilled in the TM forums I've been on, so I would never > > claim to have anything like complete knowledge of that > > (and I have no way of knowing how accurate the spilled > > beans are with regard to what Maharishi actually said)." > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/337767 > > > > Ooooooooopsie. *BIG* Oooooooooopsie. > > > > > Nabby, spinning another of his made-up fantasies: > > > > That's right, they shouldn't. Yet both Curtis and > > > > the Turq claim to be VERY special and in possession > > > > of knowledge not known to Sidhas because they were > > > > teachers decades ago. > > > > One of them was involved so long ago that the TMO > > > > didn't even have Sidhas at the time. > > > > > > Judy *knows* that this is not true, and that (as far > > > as I know) both Curtis and myself learned the TM-Sidhis > > > and practiced them. But she won't say anything, because > > > Nabby is dissing US, as she feels he "should." > > > > Barry misunderstood what Nabby was saying, as he > > has pointed out. > > > > > Jimbo, in one of his recent fits of jealousy: > > > > > Barry's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 > > > > > years ago) - Not speculation, not bullshit, not > > > > > conjecture - Daily practice x 2 = ZERO sessions > > > > > since 1970. > > > > > > Judy *knows* that this is not accurate, and that I > > > kept practicing TM through 1979 or 1980, until I ran > > > into a better and more effective form of meditation. > > > But not a word. > > > > I actually don't keep mental track of your time in > > the movement, Barry, sorry if that hurts your > > feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, wait. My bad. She *did* correct something: > > > > > Judy's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 > > > > > years ago) ... > > > > > > > > Doesn't affect your conclusion, DrD, but actually only > > > > since 1975 ... > > > > > > THAT was the only thing she felt it necessary to > > > comment on. That's the self-appointed "FFL arbiter of > > > fairness and truth" for you. :-) > > > > > >
