--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > If I may say something more esoteric here, for me Judy is still a young 
> > > soul, despite of the age of her physical body. There will be always a 
> > > conflict with older souls here, who draw from a wider field of experience 
> > > and thinking, who have come a longer way, and that manifests usually 
> > > early on in this life.
> > 
> > 
> > If it wasn't a sad and arrogant statement from the above I'd say it will 
> > qualify for: JOKE of week !
> 
> No, no, no. get it right Nabby. BOLLOCKS of the week. Jeez, talk
> about "self-aggrandisement"...



With opponents like navashok, the neurotic ex-pat and the wannabe-negro who 
thinks he's an artist, Judy hasn't much serious work to do these days.


> 
> Then again, this is quite common in debate these days, no? You
> don't just *disagree* with someone. You also wheel in some pseudo-
> crappy theory about WHY they disagree with you. e.g. The wrong
> bits of the brain "light up", or they are in "denial", etc etc.
> It's a nice short cut to avoid dealing with the very messy 
> nitty-gritty of logic, argument and evidence.
> 
> PaliGap's Thought-de-Jour:  Treat with great suspicion anyone
> who uses the word "brain" when any perfectly serviceable English
> word such as "me" or "mind" is available to do the job at hand. 
> 
> And also watch out for the word "epistemology". It does NOT mean
> "how we justify belief" (Karl Popper would be rotating in his
> grave at a rate of knots). It means the "theory of knowledge"
> (as Emily correctly ascertained).
> 
> Just sayin'
> 
> BTW Is Virish (or whatever his name is) "guilty until proved
> innocent"? I say this as someone who whilst once running a
> small organisation, got accused of "sexual harrassment"
> myself. It's not nice. In my case the biddy was a nutter, we
> were not in the public eye, and it came to nothing. 
> 
> At least that's my story!
>


Reply via email to