I remember talking to one woman whose boyfriend took a Sterling course in 
Fairfield. She said that before the course he was a perfectly normal, pleasant 
guy, but after the course he became a complete asshole. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation" <seekliberation@...> 
wrote:
>
> ahhh, the whole sterling men's group cult that started back in the 90's.  I 
> remember that whole thing (I think it's still going).  I ended up going to 
> the 'weekend seminar' that is the basis of the whole group.  It's actually 
> valuable if you've been raised like a modern american male (irresponsible, 
> immature, unable to transition from boyhood to manhood, etc...).  The whole 
> weekend is about a lot of things, but primarily what I got out of it is a 
> view of how weak and pathetic men are becoming decade after decade in 
> America.  It was a kind of eye-opening experience for me, and i'm thankful 
> for it.  Othwerwise, I do believe I would've continued in life with a lot of 
> perpetual abandonment of responsibility and growth that is often justified by 
> modern American males to avoid altogether.
> 
> However, the whole sterling men's group turned into a 'cult within a cult'.  
> Not only were the men from Fairfield mostly meditators, but now they're a 
> part of another new 'paradigm-shifting' group.  I found that a lot of the men 
> in that group were doing a lot of superficial things that were just NOT a 
> part of their character.  It was usually to display some masculinity or 
> manliness.  There were so many of them that would all of a sudden try acting 
> tough, though they never were tough their entire life.  The intensity of 
> their recruiting efforts was borderline psychotic.  I honestly believe that 
> only a sociopath could remain in that group without any serious conflict with 
> others.  Many men who were part of it eventually drifted away due to the same 
> perceptions that I had of it.  However, we all agreed it (the weekend 
> seminar) changed our lives for the better.
> 
> The funny part about it is that eventually the Head Honcho of all nationwide 
> Sterling groups (Justin Sterling) made an executive decision to disband the 
> group from Fairfield from being an official representation of the 'Sterling 
> Men's Group'.  I'm not sure why, but I think that the leader of the whole gig 
> felt that something was seriously wrong with the men's group from Fairfield 
> in comparison to other groups in the rest of the nation.  He was probably 
> right.  A lot of these men were fanatics about TM, or some other form of 
> spirituality or new-agism.  And if you take someone like that and latch them 
> onto another belief system, it's like the fanatacism goes through the roof.
> 
> All that being said, I do agree that the weekend has changed some people's 
> lives, but I would strongly recommend avoiding the group activities that come 
> afterward (unless you really enjoy it).  It was a major pain in the ass when 
> I announced to the group that I didn't want anything to do with them anymore. 
>  It's worse than trying to tell a military recruiter that you changed your 
> mind�..literally.  
> 
> seekliberation
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > I am guessing that this is carry over from the "Mens" movement thing
> > from some time ago.  Was it Sterling, or something?  I guess I could
> > look it up.  But I remember someone from Fairfield, put one of my good
> > friends from here in St. Louis to recruit me, or invite me to
> > participate or something.  It was awkward for him, and it was awkward
> > for me.  But the Fairfield guy employed all the high pressure tactics
> > you use to sell something. My friend and I were at my house and the FF
> > guy was doing his thing on the phone.  But then, as now, I didn't care
> > to get recruited to a new group.
> > 
> > And truthfully, I still have resentment for that guy for his blatant
> > manipulation.  He just wouldn't take no for an answer.
> > 
> > Who knows, maybe I could have benefited from it.
> >
>


Reply via email to