Share, I want to say that although I don't understand most of what you say, I do really enjoy your poetry. Have a lovely day.
>________________________________ > From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> >Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:38 AM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: There was Time Before the Big Bang But With >No Space > > > >the rocks are listening to everything we say >as we amble through the forum forest >and into Gaia they tap their SOS > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: John <jr_...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:24 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: There was Time Before the Big Bang But With No >Space > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: >> >> hey John and Ann, definitely some neurons of mine were not initially firing >> about all this. And I appreciate how both of you have remedied that >> situation (-: >> >> John, it sounds like Ann is saying that BY DEFINITION a sound is an energy >> wave that hits a human ear drum and is then interpreted by a human brain to >> be a sound. This makes sense. Then I wondered: well what about animals >> and what about human who cannot hear? And I like how you extend this >> avenue of thought even farther, John. But isn't it true that we can only >> assume that the laws of physics will be preserved? And are you saying that >> consciousness is the ultimate perceiver? >> > >Share, > >Yes, Consciousness is everywhere even in a rock or in another tree. As such, >a sound of a falling tree will be heard in a place without humans or >humanoids. And, the laws of physics are preserved. However, that sound will >be perceived differently by a rock and a human. > >JR > >> >> Maybe all communication simply comes back to being clear about definitions. >> Anyway, I'm feeling very philosophical now. >> >> Ann I chuckled at your joke about the echo but will restrain myself and not >> put a you know what such as I did in first sentence above. Here's another >> question: in the absence of a smiley face, smile, LOL, LMHA, etc. has >> humor occurred? >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: John <jr_esq@...> >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:22 PM >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: There was Time Before the Big Bang But With No >> Space >> >> >>  >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: >> > > >> > > Share, >> > > >> > > The physicist is making a bold statement there and she knows it. She's >> > > asking for a strong backlash when she said time existed even before the >> > > Big Bang. I can see the following questions coming up: Is Time the >> > > essence of God or vice-versa? Is there time in heaven or the unified >> > > field? Is there a prime mover or the cause of Time? What proof does >> > > she have to make such statements? >> > > >> > > JR >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > hey John I very much enjoyed this. Being a word person, was amazed >> > > > to learn that the word time is the noun that occurs most >> > > > frequently. Also her point about atomic clocks off earth running >> > > > slower helped me understand the role of gravity in relation to time. >> > > > >> > > > I wonder if there can be time if there is no one to perceive its >> > > > passage. Kind of like, if a tree falls in a forest empty of >> > > > people, does it make a sound. To that I say yes. Because of >> > > > the physical properties of trees and ground and sound waves. >> > >> > Although a falling object creates waves of energy that when they hit the >> > ear drum produce something we call "sound" I would have to say that if >> > there are no eardrums to receive the sound waves there is, in fact not >> > sound. There is only the potential for sound if there is the instrument >> > (an ear drum) present to have those waves impact it. There has to be a >> > recipient in this case who has the tools to transform waves into what he >> > know as sound. (I think I just repeated myself about three time. Does that >> > mean there is an echo in here?) >> >> Ann, >> >> If a tree fell in an earth-like exoplanet without any humans or humanoids, >> would it make a sound? >> >> IMO, the answer is yes because consciousness is everywhere in the universe, >> even in a piece of rock. Also, the laws of physics must be preserved so a >> sound of a falling tree will be produced even without humans or humanoids in >> the exoplanet. >> >> JR >> > > > > > > >
