Sorry, Share. I misread you. It seems you *have* read my post. But there was no irony in the three posts which led you to write to Judy.
So you have left me baffled: Why did you ask Judy why I wrote those posts, since the reason you give here does not apply to those posts? If they were not ironic--and they were not; there must be another reason why you asked Judy that question other than what you tell me here. I do, however, have an answer to the question I have posed to you: viz. Why did you ask Judy that question? It's pretty interesting. Let me know if you want me to tell you. Sincerely, Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > Sorry for the Thomistic Slip there. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Robin, your response to me has not yet appeared in my inbox. I only know > > > of it because I saw it in one of Judy's responses which HAS appeared in > > > my inbox. One of God's little jests no doubt. > > > > > > Anyway, semi annual Dome cleaning today so I'm rushing out. For now I'll > > > simply say that to me you seem ironic almost all of the time. And it > > > does my head in. That's why I wrote to Judy rather than to you about > > > your recent posts. And why I won't say thank you for replying to me. > > > Though I'm glad you're posting again on FFL. > > > Share > > > > Let me know when it does show up. > > > > (In this case Gd's jest surely cannot last forever--and from your post you > > have implied it might). > > >
