--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > There was no need at all to respond to Share in that rude and > > > insulting manner. Small wonder that so many people here dislike > > > you. You've just given a perfect example of why. Why don't you > > > just delete that post, which came from some very unpleasant > > > place inside you, and simply ask her for more details? Try to > > > be helpful for once. > > > > I'm at least partially in sympathy with Barry on this > > one. She should at least have been able to figure out > > that there's no way she can expect anyone to help her > > unless she takes a little more time and thought to > > formulate her question. > > > > But the question was designed to elicit sympathy for > > how computer-incompetent she is. It was designed to > > make people stand on their heads trying to understand > > what her problem is, designed to get her lots of > > attention from dupes like you, feste. > > Well, this is interesting. A real dilemma for authfriend. Her worst enemy > attacks another hated enemy, so who is she to side with? She sides with > Barry, amazingly (never before been known) because, so it would seem, her > hatred of Share is even greater than the hatred she feels for Barry.
I'm sure that's how it would work with *you*, feste, a big problem. Me, I go with whatever seems right to me, no matter who's espousing it. Thus no "dilemma" at all. (And I've taken Barry's side a number of times when I thought he was right about something. Share's side as well. Sorry you missed them.) Gee, you're looking like rather a dope so far today, aren't you? And you so much wanted to be a hero to Share. Too bad. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hi computer experts, yesterday, somehow the little paging > > > > > arrow disappeared. It allows one to check emails page by > > > > > page going either back or forward. > > > > > Any ideas how I can get it back? Thanks > > > > > > > > Hi, computer-incompetent. > > > > > > > > Your question makes no sense whatsoever because you > > > > didn't provide enough information. No one you're > > > > asking has any idea which program you are using to > > > > read Fairfield Life, and thus cannot comment. All > > > > that we know is that the program is so ill- > > > > behaved that it continues to insert these dumb > > > > ^A symbols at random in your posts when seen in > > > > certain views. > > > > > > > > "Little paging arrow" is similarly ill-considered. > > > > Try calling things what they are, after telling the > > > > people you're asking what program you're using, and > > > > on what platform (Windows, Mac, or Unix) you're using > > > > it, and other pieces of necessary information, and > > > > you maybe will get an answer. > > > > > > > > Maybe. The "helpless little girl" act doesn't tend > > > > to work very well with computer nerds. They might > > > > suggest that you RTFM. You have a history, after > > > > all, of asking questions here that you could easily > > > > have figured out on your own. > > > > > > > > > >