--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > Even at its most extreme, I always took the rhetoric about the TM-Sidhis > > > as concerning control or mastery, or at least working with the laws of > > > nature, not defeating them. > > > > It's the same thing Lawson, defeating gravity is the same as > > mastering it, it no longer affects you. > > > > Affects you differently might be more accurate. > > > > > > MMY used to say that the laws of nature in the vicinity of our planet > > > were stupid and needed to be woken up [by group meditation and group > > > practice of the TM-Sidhis]. > > > > The laws "in the vicinity" of our planet are stupid? He clearly never > > studied physics like he claimed then, for they are the same everywhere. > > > > > The "laws of nature" are the devas, in Maharishi-speak. When they aren't > dealt with appropriately, the behavior of the devas defaults to the laws of > physics and so on. When they are dealt with appropriately, they can be > reasoned with, or coaxed, or something, to behave in ways different than > their default mode of conduct. > > Or something.
Or something, yes. I sense we shouldn't be relying on these guys for our science updates. > L >
