Gee, Jimbo, for an "enlightened" person you seem to have your panties in an awful twist. I was just pointing out that your 'tude is reminiscent of all those times you have embarrassed yourself so thoroughly on this forum that you build up to a fever pitch of invective and then disappear for a while, only to "come back" a few months later with a whole new posting ID, and try for a "do over."
Who will you be next time? Curious minds want to know in advance. :-) For that matter, since we've pretty much established over the last few days that Judy can't handle Yes/No questions about past actions she's a bit...uh...embarrassed about, let's see how *you* do with such a question: "Jim Flanegin, did you ever post to Fairfield Life under the screen name of "enlightened_dawn11" between September 2008 and May 2009?" Assuming you finally have the balls to say "Yes" (you never *have* had the...uh...balls to be able to admit it), a followup non-Yes/No question might be: "WTF were you *thinking*, posing as a woman all that time?" :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Glad you are giving it some thought. I have often noticed > when I nail your ignorance, Barry, that you will no longer > post that day. It is really a striking contrast - If I say > nothing, you will blithely post as many times as you like, > but when I call you on your shit, you stop posting, as if > scalded. > > Oh man, and the other thing I really really wished I had > mentioned in my last post, is your pandering to your > imagined audience. You will call me Jimbo or Doc, depending > on which way you think the public wind is blowing. This > time its Jimbo - ooooh. Very chickenshit of you, dude. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Please, settle down, Steve. I could not care less about > > > > Robin, or his reputation on here. > > > > > > I've gathered that Jim. But more information about something > > > is better than less information when you are sorting something > > > out. And neither am I gloating about something that appears > > > to "go against" Robin, (and Judy, at this point, as she has > > > positioned herself as Robin's most ardent defender). > > > > > > And nor do I see Barry gloating about it. But since he has > > > been vilified as being such a hater of Robin, (next to Curtis > > > of course, as determined by Judy, who evidently has a scale > > > for such things), why not bring it to the table. > > > > > > In a few hours it will be far in the rear view mirror, unless > > > other parties decide to run with it. > > > > "Run with it?" It's far more likely, given the thing > > that Jimbo has most in common with Robin, that he'll > > react to people criticizing *him* instead of his > > intended victims the way both he and Robin have > > in the past. > > > > "Run away! Run away! Run away!" > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92gP2J0CUjc > > > > :-) > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wow! what a reaction. is this an extreme example of shooting the > > > > > messenger? don't even need a show of hands for that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, no street cred for you, little guy. Any student of human > > > nature > > > > > knows that you cannot first shit all over someone, as you have > > > Robin, > > > > > and then trot out some third party excerpt, trying to show your > > > > > objectivity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who does that?? Only an idiot would operate that way, or someone > > > so > > > > > bent on denigrating someone, that they fail to see their own > > > > > transparency (in other words, an idiot). > > > > > > > > > > > > Personally, I rate your post, "CI", for Completely Impotent. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I pass along here something sent to me by a lurker who preferred > > > to > > > > > have > > > > > > > someone else post it so as not to become a target for the "Robin > > > > > > > supporters." It is an excerpt from a book called "Sacred > > > Schisms: > > > > > How > > > > > > > Religions Divide," edited by James R. Lewis and Sarah M. Lewis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot confess to having done all my Steinian Due Diligence on > > > the > > > > > > > editors, but a quick glance at their other works seems to > > > indicate > > > > > that > > > > > > > they are scholars with an interest in religions, as opposed to > > > > > someone > > > > > > > with an axe to grind. I pass it along because it seems to be > > > > > something > > > > > > > we don't get much of around here, a view of the whole Robin > > > > > phenomenon > > > > > > > presented without emotion or allegiance to one "side" of the > > > story > > > > > or > > > > > > > another. It seems to present some contradictions to claims here > > > > > about > > > > > > > how much Robin continued to "revere" Maharishi and his teachings > > > > > during > > > > > > > his 15 minutes of fame. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Amazon link to their book is the first link below, and a > > > Google > > > > > > > Reader "Look Inside This Book" is provided at the second (and > > > third) > > > > > > > links. Google Reader does not seem to allow cut-and-paste, so I > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > duplicate it here. The link pointed for me to page 292, but the > > > > > > > information about Robin and his relationship with Maharishi > > > starts > > > > > at > > > > > > > the bottom of page 289. It is missing page 294 for some reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Sacred-Schisms-How-Religions-Divide/dp/0521881471 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://books.google.com/books?id=2ama0nYRlB8C&pg=PA292&lpg=PA292&dq=%22R\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > obin+Carlsen%22&source=bl&ots=T2I4atqqNl&sig=eRRuklROm7gPtmTdS7FEHPvCU8M\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &hl=en&sa=X&ei=GODTUc2-B9P20gXaioDIAw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCDge#v=onepage&q=%22R\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > obin%20Carlsen%22&f=false > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robin+Carlsen%22&source=bl&ots=T2I4atqqNl&sig=eRRuklROm7gPtmTdS7FEHPvCU8\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > M&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GODTUc2-B9P20gXaioDIAw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCDge#v=onepage&q=%22\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > Robin%20Carlsen%22&f=false> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/nwpvnuc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
