On Jul 11, 2013, at 7:23 PM, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartax...@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
>
> On 7/11/13 12:19 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
> > Getting someone to learn a technique probably does not work. The
> > person needs some sense of purpose, internally on their own, to
> > persist with a practice. Why are you we doing this? What do you we
> > want? Why do you we think this might work to achieve that? I think a
> > lot of people we learn TM as the behest of others badgering them us,
> > which probably partly accounts for the low rate of long-term
> > meditators, something in the range of 10% to 20% of people who learn.
> Xeno baby - you are losing focus, veering off your persona here - watch
> it !!! I corrected your post, corrections in Red
>
Yes, but what if I were color blind, had protanopia? This is found in about 8% of males. You cannot be certain I can see what you are talking about. Anyway, Yahoo managed to completely strip out what you wrote when I opened the reply window. So any reply will make little sense to anyone reading my reply. I am sure that suits you fine.


Don't get clever with me Xeno baby, I don't have a whole lot of time monitoring, correcting you. I have lot of responsibilities and my time is better served elsewhere than baby sitting a stupid, senile, seventy year old having trouble sticking to his sole trick. No more slip ups OK? Now focus and reply to Emily, don't veer from the template we have identified.


<<inline: us.gif>>

<<inline: stime=1373595813>>

Reply via email to