--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > > > 1. The absence of snipping keeps the original context. > > > > But often a reply is only directed to a portion of > > > > whatever was in a post, so it depends. > > > > > > And besides, only the truly paranoid give a shit if > > > someone snips part of what they said. I mean, give > > > me a break...AS IF *anything* ever said on this > > > forum was worth preserving its "context." :-) > > > > > > > Judy and Barry format with newspaper sized columns. > > > > This works pretty well for preserving the format > > > > unless the material has been requoted in Yahoo > > > > many times, or the viewing screen is very small, > > > > then lines may break erratically. > > > > > > I do it mainly out of habit, and because I'm a > > > bit of a nitpicker when it comes to such things. > > > If you haven't noticed, I often reformat the > > > original quoted text so that it *doesn't* get > > > messed up after multiple quotes. It's an OCD > > > thang, perhaps, but it amuses me. :-) > > > > > > > Note, when he was here, Robin used to reformat all > > > > his discussions with people's names and a number > > > > to indicate how far back in the conversation or > > > > diatribe that was going on. That also worked well. > > > > > > For you, perhaps. I thought it was the dumbest > > > affectation I've ever seen on the Internet. I > > > mean, *really*, he did it so that all of *his* > > > precious words got reposted over and over and > > > over, AS IF someone was actually going to read > > > them this time. :-) > > > > Been a while at the cafe now Barry? You seem to have crossed the threshold > > and just consumed your "mean drink". That usually means about the third of > > fourth of the night. > > > > > > > Dear Turquoise B, > > You may have skipped over this post. I found it especially > creepy, even for Angry Arrogant Ann.
Creepy yes. Because I have a lot of experience with mean drunks. But that is where the similarity between Barry and my father ends. My father was a winner, a lion, accomplished and he died a happy and fulfilled man - sober. >She seems right on > the verge of calling you "daddy." Sooo sooo close it made my > skin crawl. Explains a lot, her being a serial cultist and so > disturbingly nasty to Share. Serial cultist is so laughably inaccurate even you would blush to know how stupid you sound and, indeed, are. Share is the serial cultist. And you are simply angry. I don't know about arrogant; you don't seem self-confident enough to be so. I'm a fighter, there is a big difference between arrogance and gumption. One day you, and Share, might be able to figure out the difference. In the meantime just keep making a fool out of yourself while Share busies herself running after the next great teacher/healer all around that square in Fairfield. Just like the locals used to circle it every weekend night - round and round and round. > > (N.B. : Whenever Vajradhatu or Curtis would mangle spelling > or syntax---"the third of fourth of the night"--- the Junkyard > dog would attribute it to them either lying or experiencing extreme > psychological distress rather than a simply mistyping. Go > figure. > > http://bit.ly/15BynQY > > 10,3000,000 hits. At first I found that kinda amazing. Later, > not so much. >
