oops, someone farted.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The absence of snipping keeps the original context.
> > > > But often a reply is only directed to a portion of
> > > > whatever was in a post, so it depends.
> > >
> > > And besides, only the truly paranoid give a shit if
> > > someone snips part of what they said. I mean, give
> > > me a break...AS IF *anything* ever said on this
> > > forum was worth preserving its "context." :-)
> > >
> > > > Judy and Barry format with newspaper sized columns.
> > > > This works pretty well for preserving the format
> > > > unless the material has been requoted in Yahoo
> > > > many times, or the viewing screen is very small,
> > > > then lines may break erratically.
> > >
> > > I do it mainly out of habit, and because I'm a
> > > bit of a nitpicker when it comes to such things.
> > > If you haven't noticed, I often reformat the
> > > original quoted text so that it *doesn't* get
> > > messed up after multiple quotes. It's an OCD
> > > thang, perhaps, but it amuses me. :-)
> > >
> > > > Note, when he was here, Robin used to reformat all
> > > > his discussions with people's names and a number
> > > > to indicate how far back in the conversation or
> > > > diatribe that was going on. That also worked well.
> > >
> > > For you, perhaps. I thought it was the dumbest
> > > affectation I've ever seen on the Internet. I
> > > mean, *really*, he did it so that all of *his*
> > > precious words got reposted over and over and
> > > over, AS IF someone was actually going to read
> > > them this time. :-)
> >
> > Been a while at the cafe now Barry? You seem to have crossed the threshold
> > and just consumed your "mean drink". That usually means about the third of
> > fourth of the night.
> > >
> >
>
> Dear Turquoise B,
>
> You may have skipped over this post. I found it especially
> creepy, even for Angry Arrogant Ann. She seems right on
> the verge of calling you "daddy." Sooo sooo close it made my
> skin crawl. Explains a lot, her being a serial cultist and so
> disturbingly nasty to Share.
>
> (N.B. : Whenever Vajradhatu or Curtis would mangle spelling
> or syntax---"the third of fourth of the night"--- the Junkyard
> dog would attribute it to them either lying or experiencing extreme
> psychological distress rather than a simply mistyping. Go
> figure.
>
> http://bit.ly/15BynQY
>
> 10,3000,000 hits. At first I found that kinda amazing. Later,
> not so much.
>
