Really nice TM Guru Purnima meeting in the Dome last nite for Badge holders or 
course office vetted only.  Nothing so secret though was said that the 
rank-and-file movement's meditator or even just any public non-meditator would 
not have been inspired by.  Was evidently a lost opportunity to have asked the 
old meditators of the community back in like the old days.  However, John 
Hagelin gave a wonderful presentation of how the movement is doing.  Much 
progress has been made since he re-oriented things from the time of Maharishi's 
death [2008].  The movement is doing quite well in modern retrofit.  You all 
should take another look at  http://www.tm.org/about-us    TM.org.    TM is on 
a comeback and that is very exciting regardless of any of the past 
controversies.  Moving forward,
-Buck in the Dome 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote:
>
> You are 100% right on this, Buck. Guru Purnima should be open to all. I don't 
> know what their problem is.  
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Reconciliation with its meditators?? The leadership has lost itself once 
> > again.  Incredible.  This is a no-brainier,  there are two easy days to 
> > invite people in on and Guru Purnima is one of them.  Instead the 
> > leadership wants to split and be contentious with people?  It is badly 
> > incredible that at a time they are wanting for people they hold out for an 
> > exclusivity over this!  Shame on them.  They seem determined to bury the 
> > old meditating movement in the exclusivity of their own fealty testing.  
> > This could have been one of the easiest meetings to host in the Domes for 
> > everyone and anyone wanting to celebrate Maharishi, meditating, or the work 
> > of the movement.  They have failed once again.
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > TM Guru Purnima;
> > > 
> > > All Meditators, Sidhas and Governors are warm invited.  Please bring your
> > > current program badge*
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kiKZjq0vTWg
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to