--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > On 07/26/2013 06:30 AM, emptybill wrote: > > [https://securecdn.disqus.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/563/8202/origina\ > > l.jpg] > > > > Bet you can't even properly define Marxism. There are elements of it > that are good. Much of it is just observation of what happens when you > let capitalism run wild and destroy society. There has probably never > been a actual implementation of Marxism. The Soviet Union failed and > went Stalinist. The lesson to be learned from the French Revolution is > the chopped the heads off of corrupt capitalists but then became corrupt > socialists and chopped their own heads off. > > The kind of "Marxism" if at all that Obama is "shown trying to revive" > is known at Neo-Liberalism or corporate communism. Ridley Scott refer > to the world "Bladerunner" as corporate communism. It is not a good > solution either. > > The solution is socialism for things that need to be in the commons and > small business free enterprise for those who want to run their own > businesses. Best of both worlds. Probably a too "enlightened" though > obvious solution for an ignorant society. >
What about Maoism? Isn't Red China going in this direction you are saying after 60 years evolution of Mao? > What most people are afraid of is not communism but authoritarianism. >
