--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > Okay Ann, I'll take your bait. Share gave a clear explanation to Jim. > But you may have missed the subtlety and nuance of it. I never saw > Share suck up to Barry. You just don't do that with Barry. > > Sure Barry's rant was mean spirited. It also seemed to contain a good > amount of frustration. And I think he also totally missed, what I felt > was, Share's deft way of dealing with the massive amount of criticisms, > insults, and non stop personal attacks leveled against her. > > Martrydom? No. Wanting attention? Fraid not. Just someone who > justifiably defended herself when attacked, and often did so in a gentle > (often) and light hearted (most always) way that just so happened to > zero in on the issue at hand. I am sorry that you aren't able to > appreciate it. > > I didn't agree with any of those criticisms or attacks on her, although > I must admit I found them rather humorous, the way they kept coming and > from every angle. But what gave me greater delight was the way in which > Share, in every case, dealt with them. > > And now we see Raunchy and others, (Judy of course) laying some nice > traps to bring up all kinds of old (PR) business. It also humorous to > see Judy, most every week, marvel at how far more overboard one of her > (perceived) enemies has gone. But this is Judy's strong suit of course. > > I may drift off to sleep after this. Wishing you a good nights sleep as > well.
Thanks but first this: you have not helped your friends here Steve. You remain firmly uncommitted in taking a stand either for or against Barry's disgusting post to Share and in so doing have reinforced him against Share. No one is laying traps for Share, Steve. Many of us are trying to help her find a way out of the trap she is in. You are not acting as her friend by supporting her acceptance of Barry's defilement. Figure it out. And why have you said nothing until now? Don't bother to answer, it was a rhetorical question. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: > > > (snip) > > > > Share, you have Stockholm syndrome > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome > > > > > > I think there's more to it than that, but this is certainly > > > an element. I suspect another aspect is the one Ann pointed > > > out last night, addressing Barry: "I think you've just > > > created the first martyr at FFL. Just watch." Prescient. > > > > > > In any case, between Barry's treatment of Share (among many > > > others) and Share's apparent reaction, the psychopathology > > > is nothing short of spectacular. > > > > This is, in one sense, a dream come true for Share. I knew it when I > read that post and I really believe it now. Barry didn't mean to do > anything positive or remotely helpful for Share; he simply couldn't help > himself. He actually reviles Share for a whole slew of reasons. I warned > her, he has been using her from the beginning. > > > > But this situation is, as you say, "nothing short of spectacular". > However, Share wants to be martyred so, in some twist of strangeness, > Barry has made her very happy on some level. And her one Knight has not > appeared because he does not want to ruffle Barry's feathers. He is > strangely silent (Steve, where are you?). Ah, the machinations of this > forum, and of human beings in general, is fascinating. Curtis even > dropped by today. If Robin were actually reading any of this he would > have something to say. But in the end, only Share can decide for herself > what serves her best and for what reasons and what it is that needs > feeding. > > > > > > > > > >
