--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > Different posts, iranitea. Here's what I was referring to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299260 > > Your earlier hostile post to him is here (December 16): > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/298885 > > Robin's courteous post to you (#299260, above) was made on > December 19; you responded very positively on December > 20--as I said, well before your post to Barry on December 26. > > Your challenge to Robin's integrity, made in a post to me > and quoted at the bottom of #299260, is what he was directly > responding to in the courteous post. But he certainly knew > of your prejudice against him by December 16, although he > didn't respond to that post. You (as zarzari) had joined us > on December 7. Your hostile December 16 post was your first > mention of Robin. > > So, bottom line, *of course* he saw through your positive > response to his post to you (that response began, "Thank > you Robin for your account! It is touching, and you have > a great capacity as a narrator...."). > > If you think I've gotten a timeline wrong, best to double, > maybe triple-check it before making your accusation. If > you aren't sure what posts I'm referring to, *ask*. You'll > save yourself embarrassment.
I know you will always dwindle out somehow, this is so ridiculous of you, because we were talking of the posts of Robin on the 27 Dec, here, in post in #298885, I was only making some hints, and well in the other post #299260, I actually responded quite honestly. Nothing there, that could prove, that 'he saw right through me', in fact, it would prove just the opposite. People have various feelings at various times, I was honest in both posts, in #298885, which you call hostile, it wasn't hostile at all, only quite honest and upfront, and in #299260. I can be touched by his account, and still think that he is wrong and actually a bit crazy. This is only in your head. The facts were, that my 'declaration' of the more explicit, was in the post on the 26 December, Robins response, which is in discussion in this thread, was a day later, and therefore more likely influenced by my post on the 26, which was more explicit. Bottom line, there was nothing mysterious that he sensed or knew about me, that is not in the previous posts for all to see. That's were you got your timeline wrong, and you prove another time, that you always disguise facts, by simply creating a diversion. Distract, point in a different direction to create a smokescreen, and ultimately make your audience tired. And it#s simply lame of you to not be able to admit obvious mistakes. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > He was nothing but courteous to > > > > > you even in his response to your hostile challenge to his > > > > > integrity. > > > > > > > > Well, it was up to him. He could have been more successful, > > > > if you weren't so outraged. > > > > > > (snicker) That response was written well before I became > > > so outraged. And you replied to it very positively, > > > apparently deciding to hide your real feelings about him. > > > He saw right through you, though, and told you so in that > > > post (the one with the mistaken attributions). > > > > > > > Just to burst the bubble a bit, for your minions, who never check the > > timeline THEMSELVES, as they are too lazy, and just BELIEVE you: You got > > the timeline all wrong. > > > > The response of (the one with the many mistaken attributions) is post > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299889 > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299889> by Robin, > > written on Dec. 27. My post to Barry, the one where I basically said > > what I thought, were I mentioned borderline, and which started with an > > agreement to Barry, which made you all upset, was this one > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299819 > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299819> on Dec. > > 26. His answer was about 20 hours later, only he responded to another > > still earlier post of mine, that may have confused you. There is > > therefore nothing mysterious in him knowing what I thought, he didn't > > see right through me earlier, this post is actually a result of his > > disappointment, oh yes he would declare that he saw through me, and > > thought I was prejudiced, whereas the reason I thought he was crazy, was > > at the start of the very same thread. > > > > Here you complain, me hiding my 'real feelings' (wrong: not feelings > > about him, but rather my opinion about the nature of his enlightenment), > > while earlier you complain about my insensitivity of revealing my > > opinion. One time you will complain, that I did it in his presence, > > because one doesn't say this in somebodies presence, and one time you > > complain, that I say it in his absence, because he is not here to defend > > himself. The person who felt I was vague and not truthful, and sort of > > contributed to be right upfront, was in no way Robin himself, as you may > > have concluded, but it was Steve (seventhray). So all your intuition, > > and his seeing thru me - its all rubbish. The one who saw through me was > > Steven. All the myth about your intellectual superiority, your always > > knowing the right timeline - its an urban myth. People never check it, > > because they are actually tired of dwelling in the past, and are lazy, > > and all too eager to follow you, and believe in whatever you say. > > >
