Ha! Yeah, I didn't eve know Jane Fonda was in the series, and didn't recognize 
her immediately when she first appeared, and so was both surprised and 
delighted in the apparently right-wing role she played so convincingly.

Thanks for your well-thought-out review of the show ... I also liked West Wing 
and -- what was the name of that short-lived one of Sorkin's? Studio 61? 
Breaking Bad I love, having just finished the first 8 episodes of the last 
season, and still waiting for Netflix to give us the final batch.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> >
> > Have others here not liked this show, and if not, why 
> > not? My wife and I just watched the first season on 
> > Netflix, and we enjoyed it a lot, for the same reasons 
> > you give.
> 
> Back when the series started, I wrote positively about
> it, so there is a certain contingent here who felt the
> need to dump on it simply because I liked it. And, as
> we have seen here before, I would bet that many of 
> those who did so have never seen a full single episode. 
> Should any of them chime in, ask that question of them 
> directly, and see whether they'll admit that they got 
> pretty much all of their supposed criticisms from other
> people's reviews.
> 
> That said, there *were* a lot of criticisms of the show
> in the media, mainly IMO *from* members of the media,
> who didn't like their foibles presented so accurately
> onscreen. Some envy Aaron Sorkin his success, and others
> envy him his writing ability, so the bottom line of a 
> lot of the criticism is, again IMO, envy. 
> 
> The silliest of the criticisms have to do with the
> characters of the primary women in the series. So-
> called feminists complained that they weren't treated
> seriously. As if women in *any* workplace in America
> *are* treated as seriously as they deserve to be. I
> personally think that many of the women in the series
> are presented as being strong, but at the same time
> capable of love and stupidity and the ability to make
> dumb decisions w.r.t. love from time to time. To me,
> that's a *compassionate* portrayal, putting them on
> an equal pedestal of capability/stupidity as their 
> male counterparts. :-)
> 
> The worst of the media criticisms are veiled attempts
> to create a furor of supposed dislike for the series,
> in an attempt to get an obviously left-leaning series
> canceled. That failed, and my early prediction of the
> series' quality being rewarded with several Emmy 
> nominations came to pass. I imagine that the people
> mentioned in my first paragraph found that particularly
> galling.  :-)
> 
> Me, I just enjoy snappy dialogue, at which Sorkin and
> his team of writers are masters, and I like complex
> characters who foil attempts to pigeonhole them, of
> which there are many in this series. Yes, it's main-
> stream television, and thus must walk that fine line
> between "being entertaining to the masses" and actually
> "saying something," but I think it's managed that quite
> successfully. 
> 
> Glad to hear you liked it. It's one of my "Monday morning
> automatic downloads" from the previous Sunday night, US
> time, along with "Dexter," "True Blood" (now over for the
> season), "Breaking Bad," and (thanks to you reminding me
> about it) "Copper."
> 
> When it comes to Jane Fonda, I have a particular affection
> for her because I discovered her early, long before she 
> gained recognition in the US as anything but another 
> example of Hollywood nepotism. After a couple of fluff
> movies in the US, she moved to France, took up with Roger
> Vadim, and starred in one of his films called (in English
> translation) "The Game Is Over" (a remake of Émile Zola's
> "La curée." I was transfixed. I went back to see it 
> several nights in a row, and started telling all of 
> my film school buddies, "This woman is a STAR!" 
> 
> Three years later came her first recognized performance, 
> in "They Shoot Horses, Don't They?" and then three years
> after that, her first Oscar-winning role in "Klute." I
> have been missing her onscreen presence for some time, so
> it is a real joy for me to see her not only take on a plum
> role like this one, but knock it out of the park. 
> 
> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, I know that not many here enjoy this series as much
> > > as I do, but I'm the only person I have to please around
> > > here, and I love it. 
> > > 
> > > I think it's tightly written, superbly acted and directed,
> > > and it occasionally makes some strong and valid criticisms
> > > of the News and how it works...and how it sometimes fails 
> > > to work. All six of the previous episodes this season have 
> > > been leading up to last night's episode, when a seemingly 
> > > strong story they'd broadcast came crashing down with 
> > > embarrassing-to-the-network and mass-resignations-required 
> > > consequences. And IMO all on the team did a fine job in 
> > > presenting this story in these six episodes. 
> > > 
> > > But -- again IMO -- all of this was preface. It was all
> > > leading up to a scene featuring the actress who had not
> > > been present so far in the season, delivering a speech
> > > that both Aaron Sorkin (as the writer) and her (as the
> > > actress delivering it) will be remembered for long after
> > > those who rag on "The Newsroom" are dead and forgotten.
> > > 
> > > The owner of the fictional News network gets called out
> > > of a charity benefit she's dressed to the nines and paid
> > > a thousand bucks to attend because she wanted to meet
> > > Daniel Craig, who was a no-show. She's not in the best
> > > of moods, because she really *wanted* to meet Daniel
> > > Craig. And to top that off, she's stoned. Then she gets
> > > called into a room and told that she has to accept the
> > > resignations of her three most key employees at the
> > > network. 
> > > 
> > > That's the setup. The punchline is that this woman is
> > > being played by Jane Fonda, one of the greatest actresses
> > > any of us have ever been privileged to see onscreen.
> > > 
> > > My bet is that she'll be nominated for another Emmy (she
> > > already was, for her work in last season) for this five
> > > minutes of screen time. And my hope is that she wins. 
> > > This was as masterful a piece of acting as I have ever
> > > seen in my life. She literally brought tears to my eyes.
> > > 
> > > Those of you who like to rag on "The Newsroom" can carry
> > > on now, carrying on. Me, I'll carry on enjoying great TV
> > > wherever I find it, no matter how many others don't like it.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to