Judy:
> > > > > OK.  I think you're suggesting that it's something of
an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
the desire not to be overshadowed.  
 
Akasha:
> > > > No, thats not quite the angle that struck me as so funny. The
deliciousness of the phrase is more a "mu" experience, a 
la "whats wrong with this picture."

Judy: 
> > > What's wrong with the picture of somebody not
wanting to be overshadowed?  You've got me
curious--can you articulate it?

Akasha:
> > Perhaps. But not nearly as well as "getting the joke", not as well
as laughter articulates it.

Independent of your use of the phrase, just consider and contemplate
for 5-10 minutes the phrase "I just don't want to be overshadowed."
Without looking for it, see if within that time period, you have a
"background/foreground" optical illusion type moment.

Judy: 
> If that isn't the infinite-regress aspect I
suggested, I suspect I'd have to not be overshadowed
to get it, at least without more clues. 

A:
Its not an intellectual exercise. No clues are needed. They may
actually spoil it. Maybe not. Its like foreground/background paradoxes
illustrated by various figures. Look at this linked one. Though the
caption "explains it", unnecessarily so IMO, one can understand it
intellectually. "Oh, I know, I have seen these, the figure changes
when you stare at it. I get it".  No, no no. You don't "GET" it until
you see the picture change. Look at the linked figure until you see it
switch. Its, for me, always a big "holy cow dung!" experience, no
matter how often I have done it. 

http://www.neurosemantics.com/Stuttering/foreground-background.htm

J:
> When it's
in words, "without looking for it" is inoperative
for me, like "Don't think of an elephant."

A:
Yes, I knew I was digging a pit in sand with that one. But the idea is
like TM, just approach it innocently.
 
J:
>My intellect can *sometimes* translate a linear
expression into something mu-like, though, or at
least get me close enough to the mu-level that I
can make the leap.  It happens just often enough 
that I'm inclined to press for intellectual clues
when there's a mu-thing I'm not getting on its own
level.  Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

A: 
But like the foreground / background thing, its not an intellectual
thing. Its not like "seeing" the trick needed to  solve a geometry
proof or something.

J: 
> "What's wrong with this picture?" is a good clue,
 but it isn't quite enough.
 
A:
It IS a good clue. hahha. And may be more than enough.

But I suspect that you are simply taking 5-10 minutes to explain why
you its not worth your time to actually do the 5-10 minute exercise
that I suggested. (The "I just don't want to be overshadowed" one.
Though you should stare at the foreground / background (F/B) one too
until you see it switch. (no cheating by saying, "oh i have done that,
i already get it." Just DO IT. Now. :)

Getting to laughter with the phrase, above, is sort of a foreground
/background thing. You say, "I suspect I'd have to not be overshadowed
to get it", may be a bit true. But I think thats another dimension of
this exercise. In a parallel way to the F/B figure, Pure Consciousness
is always in the background, always has been. Its an "ah ha"
experience when it magically swithches to the foreground. Just like
the F/B figure "experience", its not an intellectual understanding,
its a "holy cow dung" experience. Or not. Maybe its just a simply,
"mundane" "oh that thing" recognition. 

I could try to explain the joke. I could articulate it. It would make
a fine essay, given it has several levels. But, one, I am quite sure
that is not necessary in order to "laugh". And, two, it may fool you
into thinking you "get it", when you only intellectually "get it",
like understanding the F/B figure has both a girl and an old woman in
it, without SEEING it. You might read the explanation and  go "Oh, I
already know that. I  learned that years ago. Is that ALL you were
saying? Big deal. Lets move on." But if you "get it" you will do more,
you will laugh.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to