Judy, are you still saying that you think Buck lied and was a liar? Emily, what 
do you think?




________________________________
 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col 
Leed
 


  
Share obfuscated: 

Judy, I don't think your definitions are always the normal ones nor the ones 
expressive of integrity.

You are mistaken.

I asked because I noticed you backpedaled, going from calling Buck a liar to a 
bliss ninny.

No, I don't think that's why you asked, and I know for a fact you didn't 
"notice" that I "backpedaled," because I did nothing of the kind.

I guess you've forgotten once again that what folks say here is recorded in the 
archives.

Here's what I actually said to Buck:

"You know what you're doing, and you know it's wrong. Plus which, it makes you 
look like a clumsy bliss-ninny, IMHO."


So this was your purported straightforward rephrasing of your disingenuous 
question?

Really?

Emily nailed it: "Everything you post is evidence of what you are negating 
outwardly at the time."






________________________________
 From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
 


  
Share wrote: 


Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight 
forward, objectivity and reality.

Right, that doesn't surprise me at all. You have your own personal subjective 
definitions that allow you to misrepresent and mislead and obfuscate and 
quibble and confuse and be disingenuous without even the slightest twinge of 
conscience. My definitions are, you know, the normal definitions that most 
people use, especially people with integrity.

But are you still saying that Buck actually lied?!

That's a disingenuous question. Let's see if you can rephrase it so it's 
straightforward. I'm betting not.




________________________________
 From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
 


  
You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in 
the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for 
reality, but that's just too darned bad.

I don't accuse anyone of lying unless they actually lie, you see. It's not just 
my opinion. Most on FFL do not lie, so those that do stand out. 



>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Judy, your repeating such things about me or anyone else for that matter, 
>>does NOT make it true. These are your opinions and your lack of integrity 
>>IMO, lies in how you assert them as objective reality.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...>
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM
>>Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it 
>>bit you in the butt. 
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Judy, I wouldn't call what you do straight forward at all. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...>
>>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:18 AM
>>>Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>You shouldn't talk, lady. At least whatever it is I do is straightforward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Maybe it's just another case of the classroom bully.
>>>>
>>>>Share Long:
>>>>
>>>>> Exactly Jason! Buck was simply being playful. It's clear to me he wasn't 
>>>>> lying because it was not his intention to deceive. Nor was he blaspheming 
>>>>> as Xeno suggested. Maybe Xeno was being playful too? Anyway, Buck wasn't 
>>>>> even being a bliss ninny. If anybody thinks somebody on FFL is a bliss 
>>>>> ninny, that anybody really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss 
>>>>> ninny is like! I stand with Buck and Col Leed. Sgt. Share
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>  From: Jason <jedi_spock@...>
>>>>>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:06 AM
>>>>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't understand this authbabe.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just because the Colonel liked it, doesn't have anything to 
>>>>>> do with integrity.  It's just Buck's playful twist on it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --- "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
>>>>>> > 
>>>>>> > You like that he wrote something about the Unified Field  
>>>>>> > and pretended it came from the Bible?
>>>>>> > 
>>>>>> > Such integrity. 
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --- "leedwilliam" <leedwilliam@> wrote:
>>>>>> > > 
>>>>>> > > NICE, going Buck am with U in all
>>>>>> > > 
>>>>>> > > 
>>>>>> > > > dhamiltony2k5@ writes:
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > In National unity of empathy and with great concern  
>>>>>> > > > for the dead
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > and their communities of families and friends,
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > by the best of science
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > I should like to see a National Day of meditation  
>>>>>> > > > called
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > for by the White House as a National coming together
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > in a Unified Field.
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > -Buck
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > For,
>>>>>> > > > 
>>>>>> > > > "Where two or three are gathered in effective  
>>>>>> > > > transcending meditation there the Unified Field will  
>>>>>> > > > be found multiplied in effect" -Matthew 18:20 
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>>




 

Reply via email to