--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > What! No review of the next to last episode of > "Breaking Bad"? Or the finale episode of "Dexter"?
Remember where I am. I downloaded both this morning, but then had to go to work. I'll see them tonight. > Where are your priorities? Who gives a shit about > a bunch of piddling people piddling over who said > what about Whole Foods? Obviously, some of those people seem to give a rather large (and smelly) shit. :-) > I tell you what, the next article on TM in the MSM > where comments are available I'm going to point to > FFL as an example for people to visit and see > how TMers behave. :-P Right ON! I'll start doing the same thing, every time I see a reference to TM. "If you want to know what the TM program produces in its practitioners, and how they turn out after decades of practice, drop by Fairfield Life." I don't see how anyone here could complain about that, right? They've claimed in the past that they're PROUD of what they say here and how they say it and what that says about both them and the TM technique they feel so strongly about. Let's give them a chance to put those words to the test. Best idea EVER! I've already started doing it, on a TM-related thread I saw the other day. Welcome, lurkers. If you need any help determining which posters on this forum are the conscientious TM practitioners, just ask. > On 09/23/2013 06:40 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > At 11:53pm yesterday (my time) Judy wrote to Xeno: > > > > > > Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything > > > with you until you've documented your accusations, or > > > withdrawn them. > > > > At 5:38am today (my time) Xeno made it clear that he was > > not going to do either, and thus expected Judy to keep her > > word and cease all attempts to have discussions with him: > > > > > > I did notice that you did not document a number of comments > > > you made here. But this response simplifies things immensely > > > because if this is true, anything I write to you here on > > > FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard to > > > these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier > > > in the thread, by your own words must stop you from responding > > > if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very Robinish! > > > > At 2:28 today (my time), Judy broke her word and wrote to > > Xeno *directly*, after claiming she wouldn't, addressing > > him directly and calling him "either very dishonest or very > > stupid." > > > > In other words, having realized the bind she'd placed herself > > in, she backpedalled like crazy and claimed that she'd never > > said she wouldn't "comment" on things he posted. She's NOT > > "commenting" in this later reply, she's addressing Xeno > > *directly*, and thus attempting to have a discussion with > > him, the very thing she said she'd not do unless he did > > what she wanted. > > > > In other words, Judy *LIED*. > > > > In "Judyworld," addressing a person directly, calling them > > names, and attempting anything she can possibly think of to > > lure them back into an argument is NOT "discussing" things > > with them. Doing this with someone who had made it clear > > that he was *happy* that she will no longer be attempting to > > discuss things with him is -- in her mind -- NOT "discussing" > > things with him. It's something else. > > > > Insanity, maybe? :-) :-) :-) > > > > > > Xeno wrote: > > > > *I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made > > here. But this response simplifies things immensely because if this is > > true, anything I write to you here on FFL in the absence of my > > documentation here with regard to these points or my withdrawing my > > comments here and earlier in the thread, by your own words must stop > > you from responding if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very > > Robinish!* > > > > > > You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations > > which, if they were true, you would be able to document. I made no > > such accusations. > > > > I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this. > > > > I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your > > accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not > > true). I didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do > > so (e.g., if you make any more false or insulting statements about me, > > I may respond to them). But your accusations, as long as they're on > > the table, have effectively foreclosed on the possibility of our > > having a friendly discussion of "philosophy or science or music" or > > any other neutral topic. > > > > And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to > > think it is. > > > > > > >
